Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.
In Ethic Within Reason, Edward Spence combats the attack against Alan Gewirth's argument for Principle of Generic Consistency. Gewirth's work often comes under scrutiny due to its unrelenting rationalist position. Spence bases his defense on Gewirth's strong justifications and resolution to traditional conflict. Through a close reading ofReason and Morality (1978), Spence uses his voice to give Gewirth's work a unique contemporary style and meaning while still holding fast to substantial features of moral principle: voluntariness and purposiveness. He uses his voice to generate a rationalist theory of morality that includes rights, virtues and sentiments of the community. Spence examines and argues criticisms against Gewirth in order to solidify his belief that Gewirth's moral philosophy still stands as one of the leading works in the study of moral philosophy.
Edward Spence is currently a Senior Lecturer at Charles Sturt University in Australia.
Chapter 1 Gewirh's Argument for the Principle of Generic ConsistencyChapter 2 Objections to Gewirth's ArgumentChapter 3 Positive Rights and CommunityChapter 4 A Reconstruction of Gewirth's Argument for the PGCChapter 5 The Unity of the Right and the GoodChapter 6 Conflicts of Duties: Special ObligationsChapter 7 Justification, Motivation, and ComplianceChapter 8 The Conflict Between Self-Interest and MoralityChapter 9 The Ethical Foundations of Professional Practice:The Application of the PGC in Professional EthicsChapter 10 The Neo-Stoicism of Gewirth's Rationalist Ethics