National expenditures for medical care in the months and days preceding death are enormous. But we do not know whether that money is buying good quality care or optimizing the quality of life of those dying, or whether the situation is getting better or worse over time. The information that exists a /describing deatha at a national level a " though some of it is very informative a " is fragmentary. This report recommends ways to fill the information gaps by better use of existing nationally-representative data, and through some new measures, in particular, a new, ongoing National Mortality Followback Survey. The aim is to allow us to benchmark where we are today as a society, and what goals we can set to minimize pain and suffering and maximize the quality of life of all of us who will die in the years to come.
June R. Lunney, Kathleen M. Foley, Thomas J. Smith, and Helen Gelband, Editors, National Research Council
1 Front Matter; 2 Executive Summary; 3 1. Introduction and Overview; 4 2. Key Data Elements Pertaining to the End of Life; 5 3. Currently Available Datasets; 6 4. Methodological Issues in the Collection and Use of Data About Dying; 7 5. Conclusions and Recommendations; 8 References; 9 Appendix A: Administrative Information for Relevant Datasets; 10 Appendix B: Information on Selected Variables; 11 Appendix C: Workshop Agenda and Participants
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Dog and Cat Nutrition
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Biomechanics Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Materials Advisory Board, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Superhard Materials