The interpretivist methodological framework made its appearance in educational research in the late 1970s, posing a fundamental and far-reaching challenge to the hitherto dominant positivist framework and opening up a number of divides that many have perceived as fundamental and unbridgeable. In the first part of the book Howe examines the issues involved and demonstrates that the divides can in fact be closed. The subsequent chapters set out the compatibilist perspective within which Howe analyses the interpretive turn, constructivist epistemology, research bias and ethics. The concluding chapter sets out a conception of democratic education research that shapes research methodology to meet the requirements of democratic politics.
and Overview.- Positivism and the Old Divides.- Two Dogmas of Educational Research.- The Quantitative Qualitative Dogma, the Incompatibility Thesis, and the Pragmatic Alternative.- The Persistence of the Fact/Value Dogma: A Characterization and Critique of the “Received View”.- Interpretivism and the New Divides.- The Interpretive Turn.- The Constructivist Turn.- On the Threat of Epistemological Bias.- Ethical and Political Frameworks.- The Interpretive Turn and Research Ethics.- Toward Democratic Educational Research.