Capital Theory
Inbunden, Engelska, 2005
16 599 kr
Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.This comprehensive three-volume edition brings together the most important contributions in capital theory, from its classical origins to its modern manifestation in endogenous growth models. The readings examine the recurring controversies, and the two incisive, and sharply contrasting introductions by Bliss and by Cohen and Harcourt provide the reader with context and guidance for making sense of this central, contentious and often difficult literature.These authoritative volumes will be an invaluable source of reference for all of those with an interest in this subject.
Produktinformation
- Utgivningsdatum2005-06-27
- SpråkEngelska
- FörlagEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd
- EAN9781840644814
Tillhör följande kategorier
Edited by Christopher Bliss, Nuffield Professor of International Economics, University of Oxford, UK, Avi J. Cohen, University of Toronto, Canada and the late G.C. Harcourt, formerly University of New South Wales, Australia
- Contents:Volume IAcknowledgementsIntroduction: The Theory of Capital: A Personal View Christopher BlissIntroduction: Capital Theory Controversy: Scarcity, Production, Equilibrium and Time Avi J. Cohen and G.C. HarcourtPART ICLASSICAL AND MARXIAN CONCEPTIONS OF CAPITAL 1. K.H. Hennings ([1987] 1990), ‘Capital as a Factor of Production’2. David Ricardo (1951), ‘IV. The Chapter on Value in Edition I’ excerpt from ‘Introduction’, excerpt from ‘On Value’ and ‘On Machinery’3. Karl Marx ([1891] 1972), ‘Wage Labour and Capital’4. Luigi L. Pasinetti (1983), ‘The Accumulation of Capital’PART IIFOUNDATIONS OF NEOCLASSICAL CAPITAL THEORY: IMPATIENCE AND PRODUCTIVITY 5. Nassau William Senior ([1836] 1938), ‘Instruments of Production’ and ‘Capital’6. Ian Steedman (1972), ‘Jevons’s Theory of Capital and Interest’7. Syed Ahmad (1998), ‘Rae, Böhm-Bawerk, and Fisher on the Supply and Demand of Capital’8. Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk (1959), ‘The Problem of Interest’, ‘Final Conclusions’ and ‘Present and Future in Economic Life’9. John B. Clark (1891), ‘Distribution as Determined by a Law of Rent’10. John Bates Clark (1899), ‘Kinds of Capital and of Capital-Goods’11. Christopher Bliss (1990), ‘Alfred Marshall and the Theory of Capital’12. Knut Wicksell ([1934] 1961), ‘Capitalistic Production’13. Knut Wicksell ([1934] 1961), ‘Real Capital and Interest (continued): A Mathematical Analysis of Dr. Åkerman’s Problem’14. Paul A. Samuelson (1967), Excerpts from ‘Irving Fisher and the Theory of Capital’15. Joseph A. Schumpeter ([1934] 1983), ‘Interest on Capital’PART IIISOME AUSTRIAN AND NEO-AUSTRIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO CAPITAL THEORY 16. Carl Menger ([1871] 1976), Excerpt from ‘The Laws Governing the Value of Goods of Higher Order’17. Frank A. Fetter (1902), ‘The “Roundabout Process” in the Interest Theory’PART IVEARLY NEOCLASSICAL CAPITAL CONTROVERSIES 18. Thorstein Veblen (1908), ‘Professor Clark’s Economics’19. Avi J. Cohen (1998), ‘Frank Knight’s Position on Capital and Interest: Foundation of the Knight/Hayek/Kaldor Debate’20. Ian Steedman (1994), ‘On The Pure Theory of Capital by F.A. Hayek’21. Murray Milgate (1979), ‘On the Origin of the Notion of “Intertemporal Equilibrium”’22. J. Fred Weston (1951), ‘Some Perspectives on Capital Theory’Name IndexVolume IIAcknowledgementsIntroductions by the editors to all three volumes appear in Volume IPART ICAPITAL IN ONE-COMMODITY NEOCLASSICAL GROWTH MODELS 1. D.G. Champernowne (1945–1946), ‘A Note on J. v. Neumann's Article on “A Model of Economic Equilibrium”’2. F.P. Ramsey (1928), ‘A Mathematical Theory of Saving’3. Robert M. Solow (1956), ‘A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth’PART IIVARIATIONS ON SIMPLE NEOCLASSICAL GROWTH MODELS: HETEROGENEOUS CAPITAL GOODS, TWO-SECTOR MODELS AND MORE 4. R. Dorfman, P.A. Samuelson and R.M. Solow (1971), ‘Efficient Programmes of Capital Accumulation’5. Robert M. Solow (1963), ‘The Rate of Return on Investment’6. W.E.G. Salter (1966), ‘A Model of the Delay in the Utilisation of New Techniques of Production’7. F.H. Hahn and R.C.O. Matthews (1964), ‘Two-sector Models', excerpt from 'The Theory of Economic Growth: A Survey’8. Milton Friedman (1976), ‘The Theory of Capital and the Rate of Interest’PART IIIPRODUCTION FUNCTIONS AND AGGREGATE CAPITAL 9. Charles W. Cobb and Paul H. Douglas (1928), ‘A Theory of Production’10. Joan Robinson (1953–1954), ‘The Production Function and the Theory of Capital’11. D.G. Champernowne (1953–1954), ‘The Production Function and the Theory of Capital: A Comment’12. Robert M. Solow (1955–56), ‘The Production Function and the Theory of Capital’13. Franklin M. Fisher (1971), ‘Aggregate Production Functions and the Explanation of Wages: A Simulation Experiment’PART IVKEYNES AND THE CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL 14. R.F. Kahn (1959), ‘Exercises in the Analysis of Growth’15. Colin Rogers (1989), excerpts from ‘Wicksellian Monetary Theory’PART VSRAFFA AND SRAFFIANS 16. Piero Sraffa (1936), Letter to Joan Robinson, 27 October, Archives, King’s College, Cambridge17. Piero Sraffa (1960), ‘Reduction to Dated Quantities of Labour' and 'Fixed Capital’18. Duncan K. Foley (2001), ‘Value, Distribution and Capital: A Review Essay’PART VIDISAGGREGATED CAPITAL, ACCUMULATION AND GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM 19. Edmond Malinvaud (1953), ‘Capital Accumulation and Efficient Allocation of Resources’20. F.H. Hahn (1966), ‘Equilibrium Dynamics with Heterogeneous Capital Goods’21. C.J. Bliss (1975), ‘The Orthodox Vision’22. Avinash Dixit (1977), ‘The Accumulation of Capital Theory’PART VIICAPITAL AND OVERLAPPING GENERATIONS 23. Paul A. Samuelson (1958), ‘An Exact Consumption-Loan Model of Interest With or Without the Social Contrivance of Money’24. Peter A. Diamond (1965), ‘National Debt in a Neoclassical Growth Model’25. J.E. Stiglitz (1969), ‘Distribution of Income and Wealth Among Individuals’Name Index Volume IIIAcknowledgementsIntroductions by the editors to all three volumes appear in Volume IPART IRESWITCHING AND CAPITAL REVERSING 1. Paul A. Samuelson (1962), ‘Parable and Realism in Capital Theory: The Surrogate Production Function’2. Luigi L. Pasinetti (1966), ‘Changes in the Rate of Profit and Switches of Techniques’3. P. Garegnani (1970), ‘Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution’4. Paul A. Samuelson (1966), ‘A Summing Up’5. Luigi L. Pasinetti (1969), ‘Switches of Technique and the “Rate of Return” in Capital Theory’6. Robert M. Solow (1970), ‘On the Rate of Return: Reply to Pasinetti’7. Luigi L. Pasinetti (1970), ‘Again on Capital Theory and Solow’s “Rate of Return”’8. Edwin Burmeister (1976), ‘Real Wicksell Effects and Regular Economies’PART IIASSESSMENTS OF THE CAMBRIDGE CAPITAL THEORY CONTROVERSIES 9. G.C. Harcourt ([1969] 1986), ‘Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital’10. Mark Blaug (1975), ‘A Final Judgement’11. Amit Bhaduri (1969), ‘On the Significance of Recent Controversies on Capital Theory: A Marxian View’12. Joan Robinson ([1974] 1979), ‘History versus Equilibrium’13. Joan Robinson (1975), ‘The Unimportance of Reswitching’14. G.C. Harcourt (1976), ‘The Cambridge Controversies: Old Ways and New Horizons – Or Dead End?’15. Frank Hahn (1982), ‘The Neo-Ricardians’16. Avi J. Cohen (1989), ‘Prices, Capital, and the One-commodity Model in Neoclassical and Classical Theories’PART IIICAPITAL, INCREASING RETURNS AND ENDOGENOUS GROWTH 17. Frank H. Knight (1944), ‘Diminishing Returns from Investment’18. Kenneth J. Arrow (1962), ‘The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing’19. Paul M. Romer (1986), ‘Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth’20. Paul M. Romer (1990), ‘Endogenous Technological Change’21. Kevin M. Murphy, Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny (1989), ‘Industrialization and the Big Push’22. Robert J. Barro and Xavier Sala-i-Martin (1992), ‘Convergence’23. Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt (1998), ‘Market Structure’24. Robert M. Solow (2000), ‘Lessons and Suggestions for Aggregative Growth Theory’Name Index
'. . . a book like this one is very welcome and much needed to recall old unsolved debates. . . Capital Theory should be on the shelves of all libraries and should be read particularly by our younger colleagues. . .'