Infantrymen have been the sledgehammer of land warfare throughout the twentieth century, but precisely how they fought at the tactical level has been difficult to determine. American historian S.L.A. Marshall, for instance, famously claimed that most Allied soldiers would not fight at all, even when their lives were at stake.In Canadians Under Fire Robert Engen explores the dynamics of what combat looked like to Canada's infantrymen during the Second World War. Analyzing unexamined battle experience questionnaires from over 150 Canadian infantry officers, Engen argues for a reassessment of the tactical behaviour of Canadian soldiers in the Second World War. The evidence also shows that Marshall's theory of non-participation in combat by Allied forces is demonstrably false: Canadian soldiers took a continued and aggressive part in the fighting. Canadians Under Fire forces a reappraisal of previous ideas about the behaviour of men in combat and offers new insight into how Canadians responded at the battlefront.
Robert C. Engen is senior lecturer in war studies and director of wargaming at the Centre for Future Defence and National Security, Deakin University.
Acknowledgments ixIntroduction 3ONE History Against Fire 11TWO The Battle Experience Questionnaires 28THREE The Officer Respondents 49FOUR The Combined-Arms Team 72FIVE Canadian Infantry Effectiveness 103Conclusion 144Appendix A: Sample Questionnaires 150Appendix B: Selected Questionnaire Statistics 166Appendix C: List of Officer Respondents 186Notes 195Bibliography 229Index 241
