James R. Farr draws heavily upon archival research and a careful reading in Counter-Reformation and social theory scholarship...this is more than a narrow regional study. it is a deeply textured argument, intended for a wide audience, that ably demonstrates that even though the religious fervor of the Counter-Reformation peaked in the 1690s, the judicial politics of eighteenth-century France elites remained heavily influenced by Counter-Reformation ideas of discipline, sin, and female concupiscence.