Jerome C. Wakefield is university professor, professor of Social Work, affiliate professor of Philosophy, professor of the Conceptual Foundations of Psychiatry in the Department of Psychiatry (2007-2019), associate faculty in the Center for Bioethics in the School of Global Public Health, and honorary faculty in the Psychoanalytic Association of New York Affiliated with NYU Grossman School of Medicine, at New York University.

• 1. Introduction: Oedipal Theory and Family Power  2. The Graf Family's Dynamics as Background to the Little Hans Case  3. Little Hans and Attachment Theory: Bowlby's Interpretation Reconsidered  4. Oedipal Power/Knowledge: The Sexualization of Attachment and the Regulation of Mother-Son Affection  5. Bowlby Versus the Spoiling Theory: Understanding the Prohibitory Nature of Oedipal Power/Knowledge  6. Olga Honig's Resistance to Oedipal Power/Knowledge  7. Trauma Theory and the Perpetuation of Mother-Bashing: Did Olga Honig's Abusive Parenting Cause Hans's Phobia?  8. The Social Context of the Oedipal Theory: Children as a Challenge to Emerging Ideals of Marital Harmony  9. Bed Time: Oedipal Power/Knowledge, Cosleeping, and the Modern Struggle Over the Child's Sharing of the Marital Bed  10. Family Systems, Lacan, DSM, and Looping: Four Alternative Perspectives on Little Hans  11. Final Thoughts: Oedipal Power/KNowledge and the Future of Psychoanalysis

'More than any of his other case studies, Freud’s Little Hans is central to his theory of the Oedipus complex, which is at the core of his conception of neurosis and psychological development. There have been many reinterpretations of the Little Hans case, but there is none that even begins to match the thoroughness and cogency of Wakefield’s exposition. This is so for at least two reasons: One is that Wakefield had access to evidence from the Freud Archives that was not available to other authors. The other reason is Wakefield’s brilliance in bring the evidence together in the formulation of a thoroughly convincing set of theses. A central thesis of the book for which there is overwhelming evidence is that with the participation of Freud, Hans’ father, Max Graf, imposed Oedipal theory on his wife and son as a means of keeping Hans from seeking intimacy and soothing from his mother and blocking his wife’s effort to provide them – all in the service of having his wife pay more attention to him than to their son. This convincing formulation is located in the context of Foucault’s power/knowledge discussion of the function of theory, that is, the role of a theory in supporting society’s changing values and structures.One can dispense with all previous interpretations of the Little Hans case. Wakefield’s characteristically compelling analysis – which is also evident in his other works, for example, his analysis of Freud as philosopher of mind - renders previous accounts essentially peripheral. Finally, two additional comments: One, reading Wakefield’s new book is like reading, through the lens of examining a particular case, an overall enlightening analysis and critique of core aspects of Freudian theory; and two, reading this book provides a taste of Wakefield’s brilliance and whets one’s appetite for gaining familiarity with his other work.'Morris Eagle is professor emeritus at the Derner Institute for Advanced Psychological Studies, Adelphi University, and author of Toward a Unified Psychoanalytic Theory 'This book is a must-read for anyone interested in Freud scholarship, psychoanalysis, psychotherapy, feminism, intellectual and social history, the philosophy of science, and the social construction of parenthood. Using previously inaccessible materials, the author critiques Freud’s famously strained oedipal analysis of a young boy’s fear of horses, arriving at a new understanding rooted in shifting cultural power dynamics. Wakefield’s readable and fascinating book restores dignity to 'Little Hans' and to his much-bashed mother, who deserves our admiration for taking her own maternal intuition more seriously than speculations from the 'new science' of psychoanalysis.'Nancy McWilliams is visiting full professor at Rutgers Graduate School of Applied & Professional Psychology, and author of Psychoanalytic Diagnosis'Revisiting Freud’s illustrious case history of ‘Little Hans’, Wakefield shows with almost forensic precision that the father of psychoanalysis got it all wrong: in fact, it was Freud’s own Oedipal theory, enforced by Hans’ father within this very Freudian family, that caused the boy’s anxiety in the first place! Wakefield elucidates a truly Copernican reversal that makes this book a must-read for anyone wanting to know the truth about a theory that has played such an outsized role in our culture at large.'Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen is emeritus professor of Comparative Literature at the University of Washington, and author of Freud’s Patients'Wakefield offers not only a logical reconstruction of the Oedipal theory, based on the case history of Little Hans—Freud's paradigm for positive Oedipus complex—but also a performative analysis of this theory, aiming to explain why it was accepted in the absence of sufficient evidential support. The impact of the Oedipal theory is described as enforcing a new form of regulation and restraint of the affection between mother and son, consistent with the direction in which marital relations were being restructured early in the twentieth century... Structured as it is in a sequence of stringent arguments, Wakefield's thesis is fascinating and persuasive. Its rare merit is that it makes the reader think.'Carlo Bonomi, PhD, is a training and supervising analyst of the Società Italiana di Psicoanalisi Sándor Ferenczi. To read this review in full please visit: Is the Oedipus complex an iatrogenic theory? Book essay on Jerome C. Wakefield, Freud’s Argument for the Oedipus Complex: A Philosophy of Science Analysis of the Case of Little Hans (Routledge, 2023) and Attachment, Sexuality, Power: Oedipal Theory as Regulator of Family Affection in Freud’s Case of Little Hans (Routledge, 2023), International Forum of Psychoanalysis, DOI: 10.1080/0803706X.2023.2273784

Jerome C. Wakefield is university professor, professor of Social Work, affiliate professor of Philosophy, professor of the Conceptual Foundations of Psychiatry in the Department of Psychiatry (2007-2019), associate faculty in the Center for Bioethics in the School of Global Public Health, and honorary faculty in the Psychoanalytic Association of New York Affiliated with NYU Grossman School of Medicine, at New York University.

• 1. Introduction: Oedipal Theory and Family Power  2. The Graf Family's Dynamics as Background to the Little Hans Case  3. Little Hans and Attachment Theory: Bowlby's Interpretation Reconsidered  4. Oedipal Power/Knowledge: The Sexualization of Attachment and the Regulation of Mother-Son Affection  5. Bowlby Versus the Spoiling Theory: Understanding the Prohibitory Nature of Oedipal Power/Knowledge  6. Olga Honig's Resistance to Oedipal Power/Knowledge  7. Trauma Theory and the Perpetuation of Mother-Bashing: Did Olga Honig's Abusive Parenting Cause Hans's Phobia?  8. The Social Context of the Oedipal Theory: Children as a Challenge to Emerging Ideals of Marital Harmony  9. Bed Time: Oedipal Power/Knowledge, Cosleeping, and the Modern Struggle Over the Child's Sharing of the Marital Bed  10. Family Systems, Lacan, DSM, and Looping: Four Alternative Perspectives on Little Hans  11. Final Thoughts: Oedipal Power/KNowledge and the Future of Psychoanalysis

'More than any of his other case studies, Freud’s Little Hans is central to his theory of the Oedipus complex, which is at the core of his conception of neurosis and psychological development. There have been many reinterpretations of the Little Hans case, but there is none that even begins to match the thoroughness and cogency of Wakefield’s exposition. This is so for at least two reasons: One is that Wakefield had access to evidence from the Freud Archives that was not available to other authors. The other reason is Wakefield’s brilliance in bring the evidence together in the formulation of a thoroughly convincing set of theses. A central thesis of the book for which there is overwhelming evidence is that with the participation of Freud, Hans’ father, Max Graf, imposed Oedipal theory on his wife and son as a means of keeping Hans from seeking intimacy and soothing from his mother and blocking his wife’s effort to provide them – all in the service of having his wife pay more attention to him than to their son. This convincing formulation is located in the context of Foucault’s power/knowledge discussion of the function of theory, that is, the role of a theory in supporting society’s changing values and structures.One can dispense with all previous interpretations of the Little Hans case. Wakefield’s characteristically compelling analysis – which is also evident in his other works, for example, his analysis of Freud as philosopher of mind - renders previous accounts essentially peripheral. Finally, two additional comments: One, reading Wakefield’s new book is like reading, through the lens of examining a particular case, an overall enlightening analysis and critique of core aspects of Freudian theory; and two, reading this book provides a taste of Wakefield’s brilliance and whets one’s appetite for gaining familiarity with his other work.'Morris Eagle is professor emeritus at the Derner Institute for Advanced Psychological Studies, Adelphi University, and author of Toward a Unified Psychoanalytic Theory 'This book is a must-read for anyone interested in Freud scholarship, psychoanalysis, psychotherapy, feminism, intellectual and social history, the philosophy of science, and the social construction of parenthood. Using previously inaccessible materials, the author critiques Freud’s famously strained oedipal analysis of a young boy’s fear of horses, arriving at a new understanding rooted in shifting cultural power dynamics. Wakefield’s readable and fascinating book restores dignity to 'Little Hans' and to his much-bashed mother, who deserves our admiration for taking her own maternal intuition more seriously than speculations from the 'new science' of psychoanalysis.'Nancy McWilliams is visiting full professor at Rutgers Graduate School of Applied & Professional Psychology, and author of Psychoanalytic Diagnosis'Revisiting Freud’s illustrious case history of ‘Little Hans’, Wakefield shows with almost forensic precision that the father of psychoanalysis got it all wrong: in fact, it was Freud’s own Oedipal theory, enforced by Hans’ father within this very Freudian family, that caused the boy’s anxiety in the first place! Wakefield elucidates a truly Copernican reversal that makes this book a must-read for anyone wanting to know the truth about a theory that has played such an outsized role in our culture at large.'Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen is emeritus professor of Comparative Literature at the University of Washington, and author of Freud’s Patients'Wakefield offers not only a logical reconstruction of the Oedipal theory, based on the case history of Little Hans—Freud's paradigm for positive Oedipus complex—but also a performative analysis of this theory, aiming to explain why it was accepted in the absence of sufficient evidential support. The impact of the Oedipal theory is described as enforcing a new form of regulation and restraint of the affection between mother and son, consistent with the direction in which marital relations were being restructured early in the twentieth century... Structured as it is in a sequence of stringent arguments, Wakefield's thesis is fascinating and persuasive. Its rare merit is that it makes the reader think.'Carlo Bonomi, PhD, is a training and supervising analyst of the Società Italiana di Psicoanalisi Sándor Ferenczi. To read this review in full please visit: Is the Oedipus complex an iatrogenic theory? Book essay on Jerome C. Wakefield, Freud’s Argument for the Oedipus Complex: A Philosophy of Science Analysis of the Case of Little Hans (Routledge, 2023) and Attachment, Sexuality, Power: Oedipal Theory as Regulator of Family Affection in Freud’s Case of Little Hans (Routledge, 2023), International Forum of Psychoanalysis, DOI: 10.1080/0803706X.2023.2273784

Jerome C. Wakefield is university professor, professor of Social Work, affiliate professor of Philosophy, professor of the Conceptual Foundations of Psychiatry in the Department of Psychiatry (2007-2019), associate faculty in the Center for Bioethics in the School of Global Public Health, and honorary faculty in the Psychoanalytic Association of New York Affiliated with NYU Grossman School of Medicine, at New York University.

• 1. Introduction: Oedipal Theory and Family Power  2. The Graf Family's Dynamics as Background to the Little Hans Case  3. Little Hans and Attachment Theory: Bowlby's Interpretation Reconsidered  4. Oedipal Power/Knowledge: The Sexualization of Attachment and the Regulation of Mother-Son Affection  5. Bowlby Versus the Spoiling Theory: Understanding the Prohibitory Nature of Oedipal Power/Knowledge  6. Olga Honig's Resistance to Oedipal Power/Knowledge  7. Trauma Theory and the Perpetuation of Mother-Bashing: Did Olga Honig's Abusive Parenting Cause Hans's Phobia?  8. The Social Context of the Oedipal Theory: Children as a Challenge to Emerging Ideals of Marital Harmony  9. Bed Time: Oedipal Power/Knowledge, Cosleeping, and the Modern Struggle Over the Child's Sharing of the Marital Bed  10. Family Systems, Lacan, DSM, and Looping: Four Alternative Perspectives on Little Hans  11. Final Thoughts: Oedipal Power/KNowledge and the Future of Psychoanalysis

'More than any of his other case studies, Freud’s Little Hans is central to his theory of the Oedipus complex, which is at the core of his conception of neurosis and psychological development. There have been many reinterpretations of the Little Hans case, but there is none that even begins to match the thoroughness and cogency of Wakefield’s exposition. This is so for at least two reasons: One is that Wakefield had access to evidence from the Freud Archives that was not available to other authors. The other reason is Wakefield’s brilliance in bring the evidence together in the formulation of a thoroughly convincing set of theses. A central thesis of the book for which there is overwhelming evidence is that with the participation of Freud, Hans’ father, Max Graf, imposed Oedipal theory on his wife and son as a means of keeping Hans from seeking intimacy and soothing from his mother and blocking his wife’s effort to provide them – all in the service of having his wife pay more attention to him than to their son. This convincing formulation is located in the context of Foucault’s power/knowledge discussion of the function of theory, that is, the role of a theory in supporting society’s changing values and structures.One can dispense with all previous interpretations of the Little Hans case. Wakefield’s characteristically compelling analysis – which is also evident in his other works, for example, his analysis of Freud as philosopher of mind - renders previous accounts essentially peripheral. Finally, two additional comments: One, reading Wakefield’s new book is like reading, through the lens of examining a particular case, an overall enlightening analysis and critique of core aspects of Freudian theory; and two, reading this book provides a taste of Wakefield’s brilliance and whets one’s appetite for gaining familiarity with his other work.'Morris Eagle is professor emeritus at the Derner Institute for Advanced Psychological Studies, Adelphi University, and author of Toward a Unified Psychoanalytic Theory 'This book is a must-read for anyone interested in Freud scholarship, psychoanalysis, psychotherapy, feminism, intellectual and social history, the philosophy of science, and the social construction of parenthood. Using previously inaccessible materials, the author critiques Freud’s famously strained oedipal analysis of a young boy’s fear of horses, arriving at a new understanding rooted in shifting cultural power dynamics. Wakefield’s readable and fascinating book restores dignity to 'Little Hans' and to his much-bashed mother, who deserves our admiration for taking her own maternal intuition more seriously than speculations from the 'new science' of psychoanalysis.'Nancy McWilliams is visiting full professor at Rutgers Graduate School of Applied & Professional Psychology, and author of Psychoanalytic Diagnosis'Revisiting Freud’s illustrious case history of ‘Little Hans’, Wakefield shows with almost forensic precision that the father of psychoanalysis got it all wrong: in fact, it was Freud’s own Oedipal theory, enforced by Hans’ father within this very Freudian family, that caused the boy’s anxiety in the first place! Wakefield elucidates a truly Copernican reversal that makes this book a must-read for anyone wanting to know the truth about a theory that has played such an outsized role in our culture at large.'Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen is emeritus professor of Comparative Literature at the University of Washington, and author of Freud’s Patients'Wakefield offers not only a logical reconstruction of the Oedipal theory, based on the case history of Little Hans—Freud's paradigm for positive Oedipus complex—but also a performative analysis of this theory, aiming to explain why it was accepted in the absence of sufficient evidential support. The impact of the Oedipal theory is described as enforcing a new form of regulation and restraint of the affection between mother and son, consistent with the direction in which marital relations were being restructured early in the twentieth century... Structured as it is in a sequence of stringent arguments, Wakefield's thesis is fascinating and persuasive. Its rare merit is that it makes the reader think.'Carlo Bonomi, PhD, is a training and supervising analyst of the Società Italiana di Psicoanalisi Sándor Ferenczi. To read this review in full please visit: Is the Oedipus complex an iatrogenic theory? Book essay on Jerome C. Wakefield, Freud’s Argument for the Oedipus Complex: A Philosophy of Science Analysis of the Case of Little Hans (Routledge, 2023) and Attachment, Sexuality, Power: Oedipal Theory as Regulator of Family Affection in Freud’s Case of Little Hans (Routledge, 2023), International Forum of Psychoanalysis, DOI: 10.1080/0803706X.2023.2273784