In the years since the Shelby Amendment, scientists, industry, and policy makers have struggled over how the publica (TM)s new right of access should be applied to scientific data. There is loose agreement that research data should be accessible, but wide disagreement over the a /deptha to which the public has such a right. The National Academiesa (TM) Science, Technology, and Law Program held a workshop to explore the mounting tensions in the federal regulatory process between the need to provide access to research data and the need to protect the integrity of the research process. The workshop provided a picture of the debate arising from passage of the Shelby Amendment and the resulting OMB revisions of Circular A-110. This report is a summary of the workshop.
Science, Technology, and Law Panel, National Research Council
1 Front Matter; 2 1 Historical Perspective; 3 2 The Scientific Process and the Universe of Data; 4 3 Public Access to Research Data Used in Rule Making; 5 4 Privacy vs. Openness: A View from the Bench; 6 5 Alternative Approaches to Data Access; 7 6 Closing Remarks; 8 Appendix A: Science, Technology, and Law Panel Biographies; 9 Appendix B: Agenda; 10 Appendix C: List of Registrants
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences, Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional Applications
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Dog and Cat Nutrition
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Environment and Resources Commission on Geosciences, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Committee to Review the Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Studies Program, Ecology Panel
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Alternative Chemical Demilitarization Technologies
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Environment and Resources Commission on Geosciences, Panel on Effects of Past Global Change on Life