Access to Justice and Human Security

Sindiso Mnisi Weeks is Assistant Professor in Public Policy of Excluded Populations in the School for Global Inclusion and Social Development at the University of Massachusetts Boston, USA. She previously served as a senior researcher in the Centre for Law and Society at the University of Cape Town, where she worked on the Rural Women’s Action Research Programme combining research, advocacy and policy work on women, property, governance and participation under customary law and the South African Constitution. She holds a BA and LLB from the University of Cape Town and received her DPhil in Law (with a focus on socio-legal studies) from the University of Oxford, where she was a Rhodes Scholar. Prior to Oxford, she clerked for then Deputy Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court of South Africa, Dikgang Moseneke. She co-authored African Customary Law in South Africa: Post-Apartheid and Living Law Perspectives, published in 2015 by Oxford University Press Southern Africa.

• 1. Introduction; Section I: Interpolating vernacular dispute management in South Africa; 2. Contentious background: history and theory; Section II: Institutional attributes of dispute management in Msinga; 3. Controversial subject matter: what disputes are heard?; 4. Competing authorities: what forums exist over what jurisdictions and how do they manage disputes between them?; Section III: Interpersonal attributes of dispute management in Msinga; 5. Contradictory social relations: who is disputing with whom and why?; 6. Conflicting identities: fears, vulnerabilities and strengths accompanying gender and age; 7. Confounding objectives: what do people really want?; Section IV: Integrating access to justice and human security in rural South Africa; 8. Conclusion: a vision of the South African legal order far beyond the Traditional Courts Bill

'This is an important book at a crucial time. It is important because it is a rare anthropological study of how traditional courts function in one part of the country, Msinga. It comes at a crucial time as the question of how to regulate traditional courts has perplexed South African policy-makers for decades and attempts at doing so have so far failed. A key insight of the book is that traditional courts should not be equated to courts but are better understood as vernacular forums for local dispute resolution. The author argues persuasively that regulation of these fora should seek to foster their capacity to be successful mediators of community conflict.'Kate O'Regan, University of Oxford, UK, and former Judge, Constitutional Court of South Africa'The lasting contribution of the book lies in the author’s ability to demonstrate the complexities of traditional justice mechanisms and the dilemmas of rural people who depend on them, especially women, while offering some hope that these mechanisms, and the core values underpinning them, can be strengthened to make these systems a viable component of the states’ strategies to provide real access to justice for these communities.'Thandabantu Nhlapo, University of Cape Town, South Africa'This book is a must-read for anyone concerned with access to justice by the rural poor in the developing world. Combining ethnography and political economy to good effect, and informed by a sophisticated conceptual framework, the book provides compelling arguments on the contradictory nature of ‘traditional’ mechanisms for resolving disputes in rural South Africa. It also outlines convincing arguments for a co-operative governance model of dispute resolution. A tour de force…'Ben Cousins, Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies, University of the Western Cape, South Africa