Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.
While most historical studies merely scratch the surface of antebellum state rights and treat the doctrine as just one of many differences between the North and South, this book focuses exclusively on state rights from colonial to Civil War times. It looks particularly at Virginia, examining how the concept of state rights became the backbone of the Old Dominion's understanding of the Union for at least seven decades.Part One looks at Virginia's ideological attitudes toward state rights, revealing how and why state rights Antifederalists recoiled from the expansive tendencies of central government power during the Constitutional debate and the Virginia ratification convention. Part Two examines the methodologies employed to maintain the currency of state rights in the face of nationalist threats to a southern interpretation of liberty by examining documents and essays by luminaries such as James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Spencer Roane, Abel Upshur, and Littleton Tazewell.
The late Charles Pinnegar was an author and retired teacher and lived in Ontario, Canada.
Table of ContentsPreface PART I: CONTRIBUTING FACTORS MOTIVATING VIRGINIA’S IDEOLOGICAL ATTITUDES1. Revolutionary Era Factors Influencing Virginia’s Gravitation Toward State Rights 2. The People’s Preratification Estimate of the Constitution 3. The Virginia Ratification Convention—Issues Connected to Government 4. The Virginia Ratification Convention—Constitutional Powers and Rights 5. Government on Trial—National Policies and the State Rights Reaction PART II: GUARDIAN OF THE PEOPLE’S RIGHTS—EDUCATING THE PUBLIC6. The Principles of ’98 7. Laying the Groundwork—Congressional Power and Slavery 8. The Nature of the Union—John Marshall vs. Spencer Roane 9. Andrew Jackson, Nullification, and the Nature of the Union 10. The Culmination of the State Rights Doctrines Chapter Notes Bibliography Index
“well-researched...a useful examination of Virginians’ contributions to state rights thought. Recommended”—Choice.
