Although most federal facilities projects are successfully completed (i.e., they reasonably meet the agency's requirements and expectations), the perception is that development of the scope of work for design for these projects is challenging and in some cases poorly performed. Based on this perception, a study was commissioned by the Federal Facilities Council (FFC) of the National Research Council to identify the elements that should be included in a scope of work for design to help ensure that the resulting facility is one that supports the fulfillment of a federal agency's program or mission. Its objectives also included identifying key practices for developing effective scopes of work for design involving new construction or major renovation projects and identifying key practices for matching the scope of work with the acquisition strategy, given a range of project delivery systems and contract methods.
G. Edward Gibson, Jr., Michael P. Pappas, Federal Facilities Council Standing Committee on Organizational Performance and Management, National Research Council
1 Front Matter; 2 Executive Summary; 3 1. Introduction; 4 2. Scopes of Work for Design; 5 3. Preproject Planning Processes and Project Scopes of Work; 6 4. Federal Agency Practices; 7 5. Policy Implications; 8 References and Bibliography; 9 Appendix A: Record of Meetings and Interviews; 10 Appendix B: Structured Interview Instrument; 11 Appendix C: Alignment Thermometer; 12 Appendix D: PDRI for Buildings Score Sheet; 13 Appendix E: Example PDRI Element Descriptions; 14 Appendix F: Stakeholder Identification Checklist; 15 Appendix G: DOE Acquistion Strategy Format; 16 Appendix H: ACC Scope of Work for Customer Concept Document; 17 Appendix I: Biographies of Authors; 18 Appendix J: Acronyms
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences, Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional Applications
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Dog and Cat Nutrition
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Environment and Resources Commission on Geosciences, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Committee to Review the Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Studies Program, Ecology Panel
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Alternative Chemical Demilitarization Technologies
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Environment and Resources Commission on Geosciences, Panel on Effects of Past Global Change on Life
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment, Federal Facilities Council
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment, Federal Facilities Council
Federal Facilities Council, and Value Engineering into Facilities Acquisition The Federal Facilities Council Ad Hoc Task Group on Integrating Sustainable Design, Life-Cycle Costing
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Federal Facilities Council, Committee on Performance Indicators for Federal Real Property Asset Management, Federal Facilities Council Ad Hoc, Jocelyn S. Davis, John H. Cable