The National Academy of Construction (NAC) has determined that disputes, and their accompanying inefficiencies and costs, constitute a significant problem for the industry. In 2002, the NAC assessed the industry's progress in attacking this problem and determined that although the tools, techniques, and processes for preventing and efficiently resolving disputes are already in place, they are not being widely used. In 2003, the NAC helped to persuade the Center for Construction Industry Studies (CCIS) at the University of Texas and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation to finance and conduct empirical research to develop accurate information about the relative transaction costs of various forms of dispute resolution. In 2004 the NAC teamed with the Federal Facilities Council (FFC) of the National Research Council to sponsor the "Government/Industry Forum on Reducing Construction Costs: Uses of Best Dispute Resolution Practices by Project Owners." The forum was held on September 23, 2004, at the National Academy of Sciences in Washington, D.C. Speakers and panelists at the forum addressed several topics.Reducing Construction Costs addresses topics such as the root causes of disputes and the impact of disputes on project costs and the economics of the construction industry. A second topic addressed was dispute resolution tools and techniques for preventing, managing, and resolving construction- related disputes. This report documents examples of successful uses of dispute resolution tools and techniques on some high-profile projects, and also provides ways to encourage greater use of dispute resolution tools throughout the industry. This report addresses steps that owners of construction projects (who have the greatest ability to influence how their projects are conducted) should take in order to make their projects more successful.
Federal Facilities Council Technical Report No. 149, National Research Council
1 Front Matter; 2 1 Overview; 3 2 Changing the Adversarial Culture of the Construction Industry; 4 3 Brief Review of Typical Dispute Prevention and Resolution Best Practices; 5 4 Use of Best Practices in Construction; 6 5 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Successful Uses of Dispute Resolution Best Practices; 7 6 Employing Standing Dispute Resolution Panels with the Bridging Method of Design and Construction Procurement; 8 7 Risk Allocation: The Pentagon Renovation Project; 9 8 Methods for Reducing Claims; 10 9 Exploring Ways to Encourage and Implement Greater Uses of Dispute Resolution Best Practices; 11 10 Getting Beyond Process to the Roots of Litigation: Changing the Litigious Culture in an Organization and Its Impact on the Construction Industry; 12 Appendix A Forum Agenda; 13 Appendix B Speaker Biographies
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences, Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional Applications
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Dog and Cat Nutrition
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Materials Advisory Board, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Superhard Materials
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Alternative Chemical Demilitarization Technologies
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment, Federal Facilities Council, Standing Committee on Organizational Performance and Management, Michael P. Pappas, Jr. Gibson, G. Edward
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment, Federal Facilities Council
Federal Facilities Council, and Value Engineering into Facilities Acquisition The Federal Facilities Council Ad Hoc Task Group on Integrating Sustainable Design, Life-Cycle Costing
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Federal Facilities Council, Building Research Advisory Board, Standing Committee on Structural Engineering of the Federal Construction Council
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Federal Facilities Council, Committee on Performance Indicators for Federal Real Property Asset Management, Federal Facilities Council Ad Hoc, Jocelyn S. Davis, John H. Cable
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Federal Facilities Council, Federal Facilities Council Standing Committee on Operations and Maintenance