Close corporations, which are legal forms popular with small and medium enterprises, are crucial to every major economy's private sector. However, unlike their 'public' corporation counterparts, close corporation minority shareholders have limited exit options, and are structurally vulnerable in conflicts with majority or controlling shareholders. 'Withdrawal remedies'-legal mechanisms enabling aggrieved shareholders to exit companies with monetary claims-are potent minority shareholder protection mechanisms. This book critically examines the theory and operation of withdrawal remedies in four jurisdictions: the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Japan. Developing and applying a theoretical and comparative framework to the analysis of these jurisdictions' withdrawal remedies, this book proposes a model withdrawal remedy that is potentially applicable to any jurisdiction. With its international, functional, and comparative analysis of withdrawal remedies, it challenges preconceptions about shareholder remedies and offers a methodology for comparative corporate law in both scholarship and practice.
Alan K Koh is Assistant Professor of Business Law at Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University (Singapore), where he teaches corporate law and governance. He earned his Dr jur at Goethe University Frankfurt and is an Advocate and Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Singapore. His research focuses on comparative law and corporate law and governance in Asia. He is an elected member of the International Academy of Comparative Law.
1. Introduction; Part I. Theory: 2. The concept of withdrawal; Part II. Operation: 3. Withdrawal in comparative perspective; 4. Germany; 5. The United Kingdom; 6. The United States; 7. Japan; Part III. Application: 8. A model withdrawal remedy; Part IV. Conclusion: 9. Conclusions, contributions, and applications; Bibliography; Index.
'This remarkable book is comparative corporate law at its best. Alan Koh combines a thorough analysis of four key jurisdictions with high-level theory and a legislative proposal. The book reveals surprising similarities and differences across countries whose closely-held business structures have very different legal and historical roots.' Martin Gelter, Professor of Law, Fordham University School of Law
Michel Tison, Hans De Wulf, Christoph Van der Elst, Reinhard Steennot, Belgium) Tison, Michel (Universiteit Gent, Belgium) De Wulf, Hans (Universiteit Gent, Belgium) Van der Elst, Christoph (Universiteit Gent, Belgium) Steennot, Reinhard (Universiteit Gent, Hans de Wulf
Klaus J. Hopt, Thomas Von Hippel, Germany) Hopt, Klaus J. (Max-Planck-Institut fur auslandisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany) Von Hippel, Thomas (Max-Planck-Institut fur auslandisches und internationales Privatrecht, Thomas Von Hippel
Klaus J. Hopt, Thomas Von Hippel, Germany) Hopt, Klaus J. (Max-Planck-Institut fur auslandisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany) Von Hippel, Thomas (Max-Planck-Institut fur auslandisches und internationales Privatrecht, Thomas Von Hippel
Dan W. Puchniak, Harald Baum, Luke Nottage, Dan W. (National University of Singapore) Puchniak, Germany) Baum, Harald (Max-Planck-Institut fur auslandisches und internationales Privatrecht, Luke (University of Sydney) Nottage, Dan W Puchniak