A nuanced analysis takes a California oil spill as its point of departure to show how affluent homeowners pushed for an environmentalism that would protect not only the earth but also property and community norms. A massive oil spill in the Pacific Ocean near Santa Barbara, California, in 1969 quickly became a landmark in the history of American environmentalism, helping to inspire the creation of both the Environmental Protection Agency and Earth Day. But what role did the history of Santa Barbara itself play in this? As Pollyanna Rhee shows, the city’s past and demographics were essential to the portrayal of the oil spill as momentous. Moreover, well-off and influential Santa Barbarans were positioned to “domesticate” the larger environmental movement by embodying the argument that individual homes and families—not society as a whole—needed protection from environmental abuses. This soon would put environmental rhetoric and power to fundamentally conservative—not radical—ends.
Pollyanna Rhee is assistant professor of landscape architecture at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, and affiliate faculty in history, sustainable design, and theory and interpretive criticism.
Introduction: What Is It about Santa Barbara?1 A New Order of American2 Education, Not Legislation3 To Cultivate and Protect4 Boundary Problems5 The Worst PlaceConclusion: The Ends of EnvironmentalismAcknowledgmentsNotesIndex
“While Natural Attachments is a deeply researched academic book, it’s written clearly enough to be accessible to a general reader. Rhee’s conceptualization of ‘ownership environmentalism’ speaks to the central conundrum we face in our efforts to slow the negative effects of climate change: who’s willing to sacrifice? Who’s willing to moderate their consumption and use of resources? Who deserves or is entitled to a liveable environment?”