Praise for the series -'I love these book. The explanations of functions are clear and the workbooks put you in context so you get much more motivated than when you're going through mechanical drills.' -Akiko Furukawa, Reading University, UKFor the Japanese Grammar-‘It is an extremely innovative work in which (1) the form-based and function-based grammar explanations are introduced in a very comprehensive and easy to follow fashion; (2) the explanation of the grammar is very clear and supported by accompanying exercises divided by level of difficulty in the workbook and (3) communication strategies, idiomatic expressions and dialogues, which are as important as the acquisition of the basic forms and functions, are also introduced to help learners develop true proficiency. In short, in my view, the proposed work approaches the learning of grammar in a unique way and is extremely practical, as rightly pointed out by the authors. It is superior to many other grammar books currently available in the market.’ Rebecca Chau, University of British Columbia‘MJG seems to be a well-conceptualized set of materials that have been carefullyconstructed with ample example sentences. I recommend its publication.’ Mari Noda, Ohio State University‘The idea of including both structural and functional explanations in one book is excellent. Students normally need to buy two separate and unrelated books. The idea of cross-referencing within one book is innovative. However, the book will become more attractive if each separate component is more interesting and innovative.’ Shoichi Iwasaki, UCLAShoichi was concerned that the proposal wasn’t strong enough in content, and had detailed comments and suggestions for improvements– see Author’s response.‘In summary, the goals of the book are very well thought out. I do think that this book makes a meaningful contribution to language learning or linguistics. However, since there are already excellent reference books on Japanese grammar and pedagogy, MJG must also demonstrate the advantage of its method. So far it has not succeeded.’ Fumiko Nazikian, Columbia UniversityFumiko felt that there were several areas of concern: lack of contextual information; Part A and B not well coordinated, examples lacking pedagogical considerations. I have talked to Yuki about this and she has taken on board the criticism; she has agreed to pay particular attention to the points highlighted in this review. Please see author’s response to reviews below.