Education is a hot topic. From the stage of presidential debates to tonight's dinner table, it is an issue that most Americans are deeply concerned about. While there are many strategies for improving the educational process, we need a way to find out what works and what doesn't work as well. Educational assessment seeks to determine just how well students are learning and is an integral part of our quest for improved education. The nation is pinning greater expectations on educational assessment than ever before. We look to these assessment tools when documenting whether students and institutions are truly meeting education goals. But we must stop and ask a crucial question: What kind of assessment is most effective? At a time when traditional testing is subject to increasing criticism, research suggests that new, exciting approaches to assessment may be on the horizon. Advances in the sciences of how people learn and how to measure such learning offer the hope of developing new kinds of assessments-assessments that help students succeed in school by making as clear as possible the nature of their accomplishments and the progress of their learning.Knowing What Students Know essentially explains how expanding knowledge in the scientific fields of human learning and educational measurement can form the foundations of an improved approach to assessment. These advances suggest ways that the targets of assessment-what students know and how well they know it-as well as the methods used to make inferences about student learning can be made more valid and instructionally useful. Principles for designing and using these new kinds of assessments are presented, and examples are used to illustrate the principles. Implications for policy, practice, and research are also explored. With the promise of a productive research-based approach to assessment of student learning, Knowing What Students Know will be important to education administrators, assessment designers, teachers and teacher educators, and education advocates.
Committee on the Foundations of Assessment, James W. Pellegrino, Naomi Chudowsky, and Robert Glaser, editors, Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, National Research Council
Front MatterExecutive Summary1 Rethinking the Foundations of Assessment2 The Nature of Assessment and Reasoning from EvidenceINTRODUCTION3 Advances in the Sciences of Thinking and Learning4 Contributions of Measurement and Statistical Modeling to AssessmentINTRODUCTION5 Implications of the New Foundations for Assessment Design6 Assessment in Practice7 Information Technologies: Opportunities for Advancing Educational Assessment8 Implications and Recommendations for Research, Policy, and PracticeReferencesAppendix Biographical SketchesIndex
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences, Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional Applications
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Dog and Cat Nutrition
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Materials Advisory Board, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Superhard Materials
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Alternative Chemical Demilitarization Technologies
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Center for Education, Board on Testing and Assessment, Committee on the Foundations of Assessment, Robert Glaser, Naomi Chudowsky, James W. Pellegrino
National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Testing and Assessment, Committee on the Evaluation of National and State Assessments of Educational Progress, Lee R. Jones, Karen J. Mitchell, Meryl W. Bertenthal, James W. Pellegrino, Nambury S. Raju
National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Testing and Assessment, Committee on the Evaluation of National and State Assessments of Educational Progress, Karen J. Mitchell, Lee R. Jones, James W. Pellegrino
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Science Education, Board on Testing and Assessment, Committee on Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills, Margaret L. Hilton, James W. Pellegrino
National Academy of Education, National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Center for Education, and Educational Accountability Committee on Value-Added Methodology for Instructional Improvement, Program Evaluation, Judith Koenig, Naomi Chudowsky, Henry Braun
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Center for Education, Board on Testing and Assessment, Judith Anderson Koenig
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Center for Education, Board on Testing and Assessment, Committee on Participation of English Language Learners and Students with Disabilities in NAEP and Other Large-Scale Assessments, Lyle F. Bachman, Judith Anderson Koenig
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Center for Education, Board on Testing and Assessment, Committee on Performance Levels for Adult Literacy, Stuart W. Elliott, Judith Anderson Koenig, Jr. Edley, Christopher F., Robert M. Hauser
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Center for Education, Board on Testing and Assessment, Board on International Comparative Studies in Education, Adam Gamoran, Andrew C. Porter
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Committee on Assessment and Teacher Quality, Kaeli T. Knowles, Barbara S. Plake, David Z. Robinson, Karen J. Mitchell