Governments face a conflicting choice between economic growth, democracy and tackling the climate crisis. They cannot achieve all three objectives simultaneously and the growing tensions between them are being played out in countries across the world. It is the new trilemma of advanced capitalist democracy.The authors use this trilemma as a fresh analytic framework to conceptualize these trade-offs and tensions in the study of capitalist democracies. The type of democratic politics required to generate growth and prosperity within the ecological limits of the planet, they argue, has not been taken seriously in the study of comparative political economy and needs to be located at the heart of future research. Given the unprecedented scale of structural reform that governments need to implement to effectively tackle the climate crisis, the authors question whether the transition to carbon neutrality can be done within the liberal rulebook that has governed the politics of advanced capitalism for the past hundred years.
Aidan Regan is Professor of Political Economy at University College Dublin.Hanna Schwander is Professor of Political Sociology and Social Policy at the Humboldt University, Berlin.Cyril Benoît is a CNRS Researcher at the Centre for European Studies and Comparative Politics at Sciences Po, Paris.Tim Vlandas is Professor of Comparative Political Economy and Social Policy at the University of Oxford.
1. Introduction: the climate crisis as a political trilemma2. The unsustainability of the status quo3. The political impossibility of degrowth4. The prospect of a big green state5. The conditions under which we can escape6. Conclusion
When it comes to economic growth, democratic legitimacy, and effective climate action you can't have it all. You can only get two at a time … The way out is a reinvigorated politics that puts citizens in charge of rebuilding an effective state. It's not going to be easy, but it is possible.