As U.S. industry faces worldwide challenges, policymakers are asking questions about the role of the federal government--not only in promoting basic research but also in ushering new innovations to the marketplace. This book offers an expert consensus on how government and industry together can respond to the new realities of a global marketplace. The volume offers firm conclusions about policy and organizational changes with the greatest potential to improve our technological competitiveness--and presents three alternative approaches for a new federal role. The volume examines * How federal involvement in technology development affects the nation's economic well-being. * What we can learn from past federal efforts to stimulate civilian technology development--in the United States and among our major industrial competitors. * How trends in productivity, R&D, and other key areas have affected U.S. performance, and how we compare to the world's rising industrial economies. Offering guidance on one of the 1990s most important issues, this volume will be indispensible to federal policymakers, executives in industry and technology, and researchers.
Panel on the Government Role in Civilian Technology, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine
1 FRONT MATTER; 2 OVERVIEW; 3 1 THE ENVIRONMENT FOR THE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT; 4 2 GOVERNMENT SUPPORT FOR CIVILIAN TECHNOLOGY; 5 3 A NEW STRATEGY TO FACILITATE GOVERNMENT SUPPORT OF TECHNOLOGY; 6 APPENDIXES; 7 A BACKGROUND PAPERS; 8 B LEGISLATIVE REQUEST FOR THE STUDY; 9 C WORKSHOP PRESENTERS AND BRIEFERS TO THE PANEL; 10 D BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION ON PANEL MEMBERS AND PROFESSIONAL STAFF; 11 E COLLABORATIVE R&D: SELECTED EXAMPLES; 12 F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY; 13 INDEX
Institute of Medicine, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Division of International Health
Institute of Medicine, Committee to Develop Methods Useful to the Department of Veteran Affairs in Estimating Its Physician Requirements, Joseph Lipscomb
Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering, Panel on Presidentially Appointed Scientists and Engineers
Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering, Panel on Information Technology and the Conduct of Research
Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering, Committee on Ensuring the Best Presidential and Federal Advisory Committee Science and Technology Appointments
Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering, Panel on NSF Decisionmaking for Major Awards
National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, Policy and Global Affairs, Institute of Medicine, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering, Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming
National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, Policy and Global Affairs, Institute of Medicine, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering, Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming--Synthesis Panel
National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, Institute of Medicine, Institute of Medicine National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering
Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering, Committee on the Federal Science and Technology Budget
National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, Policy and Global Affairs, Institute of Medicine, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering
As U.S. industry faces worldwide challenges, policymakers are asking questions about the role of the federal government--not only in promoting basic research but also in ushering new innovations to the marketplace. This book offers an expert consensus on how government and industry together can respond to the new realities of a global marketplace. The volume offers firm conclusions about policy and organizational changes with the greatest potential to improve our technological competitiveness--and presents three alternative approaches for a new federal role. The volume examines * How federal involvement in technology development affects the nation's economic well-being. * What we can learn from past federal efforts to stimulate civilian technology development--in the United States and among our major industrial competitors. * How trends in productivity, R&D, and other key areas have affected U.S. performance, and how we compare to the world's rising industrial economies. Offering guidance on one of the 1990s most important issues, this volume will be indispensible to federal policymakers, executives in industry and technology, and researchers.
Panel on the Government Role in Civilian Technology, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine
1 FRONT MATTER; 2 OVERVIEW; 3 1 THE ENVIRONMENT FOR THE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT; 4 2 GOVERNMENT SUPPORT FOR CIVILIAN TECHNOLOGY; 5 3 A NEW STRATEGY TO FACILITATE GOVERNMENT SUPPORT OF TECHNOLOGY; 6 APPENDIXES; 7 A BACKGROUND PAPERS; 8 B LEGISLATIVE REQUEST FOR THE STUDY; 9 C WORKSHOP PRESENTERS AND BRIEFERS TO THE PANEL; 10 D BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION ON PANEL MEMBERS AND PROFESSIONAL STAFF; 11 E COLLABORATIVE R&D: SELECTED EXAMPLES; 12 F REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY; 13 INDEX
Institute of Medicine, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Division of International Health
Institute of Medicine, Committee to Develop Methods Useful to the Department of Veteran Affairs in Estimating Its Physician Requirements, Joseph Lipscomb
Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering, Panel on Presidentially Appointed Scientists and Engineers
Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering, Panel on Information Technology and the Conduct of Research
Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering, Committee on Ensuring the Best Presidential and Federal Advisory Committee Science and Technology Appointments
Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering, Panel on NSF Decisionmaking for Major Awards
National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, Policy and Global Affairs, Institute of Medicine, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering, Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming
National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, Policy and Global Affairs, Institute of Medicine, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering, Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming--Synthesis Panel
National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, Institute of Medicine, Institute of Medicine National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering
Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering, Committee on the Federal Science and Technology Budget
National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, Policy and Global Affairs, Institute of Medicine, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering