Evolutionary Biology: Contemporary and Historical Reflections Upon Core Theory

Inbunden, Engelska, 2023

Av Thomas E. Dickins, Benjamin J.A. Dickins, Benjamin J. a. Dickins, Benjamin J. A. Dickins

3 329 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar

Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.

This book is reflecting upon core theories in evolutionary biology – in a historical as well as contemporary context. Chapters 8, 20, 22 and 33 are available open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License via link.springer.com.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum2023-03-09
Mått155 x 235 x 40 mm
Vikt1 121 g
FormatInbunden
SpråkEngelska
SerieEvolutionary Biology – New Perspectives on Its Development
Antal sidor625
FörlagSpringer International Publishing AG
ISBN9783031220272

Tillhör följande kategorier

Thomas E. Dickins is professor of behavioural science at Middlesex University. He has a background in psychology, history and philosophy of science, evolutionary psychology and ecology. His interests fall within behavioural biology and include work on theoretical aspects of evolutionary theory and its application. Most recently this has included addressing current calls for an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis and developing arguments in support a version of the Modern Synthesis in evolutionary biology. Aside from theoretical work, Tom is pursuing a long term study of Kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) at a number of field sites in the south of England as well as various studies on human behaviour.Benjamin J.A. Dickins is a senior lecturer at Nottingham Trent University. Ben is interested in genome evolution and in the process of adaptation. He has used a range of sequencing and bioinformatic approaches to address problems with bacteriophages and dinoflagellates as contrasting model systems in his laboratory. His doctoral training (at the Babraham Institute, UK) provided a detailed knowledge of molecular biology/genetics in the context of understanding the physiological consequences of genomic imprinting. His postdoctoral experience (at Penn State University, US) familiarised him with (next-generation) sequencing workflows and computer programming as he participated in work on the mutation rate of human mitochondrial DNA and evolutionary dynamics in a phage.

Chapter 1: Introduction.- Part 1.- Chapter 2: Every Evolutionist their Own Historian: The Importance of History, Context, and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis.- Chapter 3: Commentary on Smocovitis: Yes Indeed, Evolutionary Biologists Should Pay More Attention to History.- Chapter 4: History, Evolution and the “Rashomon Effect”:Reply to Svensson.- Part 2.- Chapter 5: The creativity of natural selection and the creativity of organisms: Their roles in traditional evolutionary theory and some proposed extensions.- Chapter 6: Let there be light: A Commentary on Welch.- Chapter 7: Creative Destruction: A Reply to Haig.- Part 3.- Chapter 8: The Organism in Evolutionary Explanation: From Early 20th Century to the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis.- Chapter 9: Causes and Consequences of Selection: A Commentary on Baedke & Fábregas-Tejeda.- Chapter 10: Organisms and the Causes and Consequences of Selection: A Reply to Vidya et al. .- Part 4.- Chapter 11: The structure of evolutionary theory: Beyond Neo-Darwinism, Neo-Lamarckism and biased historical narratives about the Modern Synthesis.- Chapter 12: It’s the endless forms, stupid: Commentary on Svensson.- Chapter 13: Ecology, Agents, and the Causes of Selection: A Reply to Shuker.- Part 5.- Chapter 14: Hypertextuality of an hyperextended synthesis: On the interpretation of theories by means of selective quotation.- Chapter 15: Teleology, Organisms, and Genes: Commentary on Haig.- Chapter 16: A token response: A Reply to Fábregas-Tejedaand Baedke.- Part 6.- Chapter 17: The Darwinian Core of Evolutionary Theory and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Similarities and Differences.- Chapter 18: Evolution is Bigger than All of Us: Commentary on Vidya, Dey, Prasad, and Joshi.- Chapter 19: Why evolution is bigger than all of us: reply to Smocovitis.- Part 7.- Chapter 20: Inclusive fitness: a scientific revolution.- Chapter 21: Phenotypes, Organisms, and Individuals: Commentary on Rodrigues and Gardner.- Chapter 22: On Monism and Pluralism: A Reply to Dickins, T.E. .- Part 8.- Chapter 23: Evolution of Bacteriophage Latent Period Length.- Chapter 24: Optimality and Idealization in Models of Bacteriophage Evolution: Commentary on Abedon.- Chapter 25: On the use of r-K selection in studying the evolution of bacteriophages: A Reply to Dickins, B.J.A. .- Part 9.- Chapter 26: Plasticity and information.- Chapter 27: Phenotypic Plasticity and Evolutionary Syntheses: Commentary on Dickins.- Chapter 28: On Rhetoric and Conceptual Frames: A Reply to Futuyma.- Part 10.- Chapter 29: The curious incident of the wasp in the fig-fruit: sex allocation and the extended evolutionary synthesis.- Chapter 30: The Nuances of Biological Syntheses: Commentary on Shuker.- Chapter 31: On Ecological Truths and the Role of Philosophy: A Reply to Distin.- Part 11.- Chapter 32: The Evolving Evolutionary Synthesis.- Chapter 33: Inclusive Fitness Theory as Scientific Revolution: Commentary on Fu-tuyma.- Chapter 34: Inclusive Fitness Theory Prefigured: A Reply to Rodrigues and Gardner.- Part 12.- Chapter 35: Genes and organisms in the legacy of the modern synthesis.- Chapter 36: The Parallax View: Commentary on Ågren.- Chapter 37: Why We Disagree About Selfish Genes: A Reply to Welch.- Part 13.- Chapter 38: Genetic Evolvability: Using a Restricted Pluralism to Tidy Up the Evolvability Concept.- Chapter 39: Pluralism and Progress in Evolutionary Biology: Commentary on Distin.- Chapter 40: Genetic Evolvability: A Reply to Ågren.

“This volume, edited by Thomas and Benjamin Dickins, is the latest installment in the debate. At 625 pages, it includes 12 original papers from 19 biologists and philosophers. … a unique feature of the volume is its structure: each chapter is accompanied by a response from another contributor, followed by a counterresponse from the author. This is a clever decision on the editors’ part … . this dialectical structure would have been especially effective.” (Caleb Hazelwood, The Quarterly Review of Biology, Vol. 99 (2), June, 2024)