Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.
This book attempts a broad theoretical synthesis within the field of sociology and its closely allied sister discipline of anthropology. It draws together what the author considers the best of these disciplinesO theoretical approaches into a synthesized theory called Darwinian conflict theory. This theory, in the most general sense, is a synthesis of the tradition of economic and ecological materialism and conflict theory stemming from Marx, Marvin Harris, and the tradition of biological materialism deriving from Darwin. The first half of the book is taken up with critiques of existing theoretical approaches; this then leads to the full elaboration, in formal propositional form, of synthetic theory. The second half of the book lays out the large amount of evidence, both qualitative and quantitative, that supports the synthesized theory.
Stephen K. Sanderson is professor of sociology at Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Chapter 1 IntroductionPart 2 Sociological Explanations that Do Not WorkChapter 3 Functionalist ExplanationsChapter 4 Social Constructionist ExplanationsChapter 5 Structuralist, Poststructuralist, and Postmodernist ExplanationsPart 6 Sociological Explanations that Work BetterChapter 7 Marxian Conflict ExplanationsChapter 8 Weberian Conflict ExplanationsPart 9 Sociological Explanations that Work BestChapter 10 Exchange and Rational Choice ExplanationsChapter 11 Cultural Materialist ExplanationsChapter 12 Sociobiological ExplanationsPart 13 Toward Theoretical SynthesisChapter 14 Darwinian Conflict Theory: A Unified Evolutionary Theory of Human SocietyPart 15 Darwinian Conflict Theory: The Weight of the EvidenceChapter 16 Reproductive BehaviorChapter 17 Human SexualityChapter 18 Sex and GenderChapter 19 Marriage, Family, and KinshipChapter 20 Economic Behavior and Economic SystemsChapter 21 Social HierarchiesChapter 22 Politics and WarChapter 23 Epilogue
An emphatically original work. . . . The book makes the point quite forcibly that sociology makes no sense unless it is anchored, not only in evolutionary biology, but also in anthropology.