Walter Jost is Professor of English at the University of Virginia, USA, and author of Rhetorical Thought in John Henry Newman and Rhetorical Investigations. He has edited or co-edited seven other books, among them Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time and Ordinary Language Criticism: Literary Thinking After Cavell After Wittgenstein.

• Part 1.- Chapter 1: This Way Please: Possibilities of Pluralism.- Chapter 2: The Linguistic Turn after Richard McKeon: Richard Rorty and Robert Brandom.- Chapter 3: Aspect Perception in Brandom and Wittgenstein.- Part 2.- Chapter 4: Topics, Tropes, Arguments I: Terms (including a Companion to Chapter Four).- Chapter 5: Topics, Tropes, Arguments II: Sequences.- Chapter 6: Topics, Tropes, Arguments III: Consequences: The Prism-House of Language.- Part 3.- Chapter 7: Judgment Calls: Sweating the Little Things in Reginald Rose’s and Stanley Lumet’s “Twelve Angry Men”.- Chapter 8: Nothing Doing in Edith Wharton’s Ethan Frome: “I had the sense that the deeper meaning of the story was in the gaps.”.- Chapter 9: Not Without Reason: Thinking Elizabeth Bishop’s Weak-Transcendental “Crusoe in England”.- Chapter 10: Grammar School for the Aspect-blind and A-rhetorical: Elizabeth Bishop’s “Over 2,000 Illustrations and a Complete Concordance” (or, Allin All More or Less).

“Jost’s scope exploring philosophical and literary scholarly resources is simply wondrous. … His footnotes combined with the main text offer an elaborate education, especially for literary critics … . Reading it again for this review I realized how much I admire the content and structure of the argumentative work this learning allows and supports.” (Charles Altieri, Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics, Vol. 48 (3), 2025)“Walter Jost has written a remarkable book, one that makes a major contribution to rhetorical criticism and theory, and more generally to thinking about thinking within humanistic studies and beyond.” (Steven Mailloux, Critical Inquiry, criticalinquiry.uchicago.edu, May 8, 2025)“Walter Jost has written an important and unusual book. ... All in All (More or Less) is important, first of all, for reviving—indeed, relaunching — a sophisticated mode of pluralism in cultural and literary criticism. ... All in All (More or Less) has the potential to illuminate the hermeneutical assumptions and cognitive habits of many readers … .” (Kevin Hart, Philosophy and Literature, Vol. 49 (1), April 2025)

Walter Jost is Professor of English at the University of Virginia, USA, and author of Rhetorical Thought in John Henry Newman and Rhetorical Investigations. He has edited or co-edited seven other books, among them Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time and Ordinary Language Criticism: Literary Thinking After Cavell After Wittgenstein.

• Part 1.- Chapter 1: This Way Please: Possibilities of Pluralism.- Chapter 2: The Linguistic Turn after Richard McKeon: Richard Rorty and Robert Brandom.- Chapter 3: Aspect Perception in Brandom and Wittgenstein.- Part 2.- Chapter 4: Topics, Tropes, Arguments I: Terms (including a Companion to Chapter Four).- Chapter 5: Topics, Tropes, Arguments II: Sequences.- Chapter 6: Topics, Tropes, Arguments III: Consequences: The Prism-House of Language.- Part 3.- Chapter 7: Judgment Calls: Sweating the Little Things in Reginald Rose’s and Stanley Lumet’s “Twelve Angry Men”.- Chapter 8: Nothing Doing in Edith Wharton’s Ethan Frome: “I had the sense that the deeper meaning of the story was in the gaps.”.- Chapter 9: Not Without Reason: Thinking Elizabeth Bishop’s Weak-Transcendental “Crusoe in England”.- Chapter 10: Grammar School for the Aspect-blind and A-rhetorical: Elizabeth Bishop’s “Over 2,000 Illustrations and a Complete Concordance” (or, Allin All More or Less).

“Jost’s scope exploring philosophical and literary scholarly resources is simply wondrous. … His footnotes combined with the main text offer an elaborate education, especially for literary critics … . Reading it again for this review I realized how much I admire the content and structure of the argumentative work this learning allows and supports.” (Charles Altieri, Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics, Vol. 48 (3), 2025)“Walter Jost has written a remarkable book, one that makes a major contribution to rhetorical criticism and theory, and more generally to thinking about thinking within humanistic studies and beyond.” (Steven Mailloux, Critical Inquiry, criticalinquiry.uchicago.edu, May 8, 2025)“Walter Jost has written an important and unusual book. ... All in All (More or Less) is important, first of all, for reviving—indeed, relaunching — a sophisticated mode of pluralism in cultural and literary criticism. ... All in All (More or Less) has the potential to illuminate the hermeneutical assumptions and cognitive habits of many readers … .” (Kevin Hart, Philosophy and Literature, Vol. 49 (1), April 2025)

Walter Jost is Professor of English at the University of Virginia, USA, and author of Rhetorical Thought in John Henry Newman and Rhetorical Investigations. He has edited or co-edited seven other books, among them Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time and Ordinary Language Criticism: Literary Thinking After Cavell After Wittgenstein.

• Part 1.- Chapter 1: This Way Please: Possibilities of Pluralism.- Chapter 2: The Linguistic Turn after Richard McKeon: Richard Rorty and Robert Brandom.- Chapter 3: Aspect Perception in Brandom and Wittgenstein.- Part 2.- Chapter 4: Topics, Tropes, Arguments I: Terms (including a Companion to Chapter Four).- Chapter 5: Topics, Tropes, Arguments II: Sequences.- Chapter 6: Topics, Tropes, Arguments III: Consequences: The Prism-House of Language.- Part 3.- Chapter 7: Judgment Calls: Sweating the Little Things in Reginald Rose’s and Stanley Lumet’s “Twelve Angry Men”.- Chapter 8: Nothing Doing in Edith Wharton’s Ethan Frome: “I had the sense that the deeper meaning of the story was in the gaps.”.- Chapter 9: Not Without Reason: Thinking Elizabeth Bishop’s Weak-Transcendental “Crusoe in England”.- Chapter 10: Grammar School for the Aspect-blind and A-rhetorical: Elizabeth Bishop’s “Over 2,000 Illustrations and a Complete Concordance” (or, Allin All More or Less).

“Jost’s scope exploring philosophical and literary scholarly resources is simply wondrous. … His footnotes combined with the main text offer an elaborate education, especially for literary critics … . Reading it again for this review I realized how much I admire the content and structure of the argumentative work this learning allows and supports.” (Charles Altieri, Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics, Vol. 48 (3), 2025)“Walter Jost has written a remarkable book, one that makes a major contribution to rhetorical criticism and theory, and more generally to thinking about thinking within humanistic studies and beyond.” (Steven Mailloux, Critical Inquiry, criticalinquiry.uchicago.edu, May 8, 2025)“Walter Jost has written an important and unusual book. ... All in All (More or Less) is important, first of all, for reviving—indeed, relaunching — a sophisticated mode of pluralism in cultural and literary criticism. ... All in All (More or Less) has the potential to illuminate the hermeneutical assumptions and cognitive habits of many readers … .” (Kevin Hart, Philosophy and Literature, Vol. 49 (1), April 2025)