Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 3-6 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.
Cohen and Sterba, two contemporary philosophers in sharp opposition, debate the value of affirmative action and racial preference. They defend thier views with analysis and commentay on landmark cases - including the decisions of the United States Supreme Court and the University of Michigan admissions cases, Gratz and Grutter.
Preface One, Carl CohenPreface Two, James P. SterbaCasesSECTION ONE: WHY RACE PREFERENCE IS WRONG AND BAD, Carl CohenPrologue: Wrongness and Badness: PART I: EQUALITY AND RACE PREFERENCE1: Equality as a Moral Ideal2: Affirmative Action3: Race Preference: The Transformation of Affirmative ActionPART II: WHY RACE PREFERENCE IS WRONG4: Race Preference Is Morally Wrong5: Race Preference Is Against the Law6: Race Preference Violates the ConstitutionPART III: WHY RACE PREFERENCE IS BAD7: Race Preference Is Bad for the Minorities Preferred8: Race Preference Is Bad for the Universities that Give Preference9: Race Preference Is Bad for Society as a WholeEpilogue: The Future of Race Preference: SECTION TWO: DEFENDING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, DEFENDING PREFERENCES, James P. Sterba1: A Legal History of Affirmative Action in the United States2: A Definition of Affirmative Action3: A Defense of Outreach Affirmative Action4: A Defense of Remedial Affirmative Action5: Remedial Affirmative Action and the U.S. Supreme Court6: Racial Discrimination v. Sexual Discrimination7: A Better Standard of Proof for Remedial Affirmative Action8: A Defense of Diversity Affirmative Action9: Objections to Affirmative Action10: Affirmative Action outside the United StatesConclusion: SECTION THREE: REPLY TO JAMES P. STERBA, Carl CohenSECTION FOUR: REPLY TO CARL COHEN, James P. SterbaSECTION FIVE: COMMENTS ON THE SUPREME COURT DECISION, Carl Cohen and James P. SterbaBibliography: Index: