Full-length analysis of one of the most politically and socially engaged medieval poemsThe late fourteenth-century English poem Winner and Waster narrates a debate between the forces of avarice (Winner) and generosity (Waster); it ranges widely over a number of major issues in the political life of England during Edward III's reign.This book sets out to re-date the poem from the 1350s to the 1360s, and in so doing to question whether its principal message really revolves (as so much earlier scholarship has insisted) around the state of public order and the costs of warfare in the 1350s. Instead, it proposes that the poem echoes debates about Edward III's ability to maintain concord between the members of his household, to manage the extravagance in clothing that prompted the sumptuary laws of 1363, and to run his peace-time finances of the 1360s in such a way as to guarantee the solvency of the crown. Drawing extensively on the records of parliament and on contemporary chronicles, this volume sets Winner and Waster within the wider context of other complaint literature of the fourteenth century, and characterizes it as one of the most politically - and socially - engaged works of the period.
The late W. MARK ORMROD was Professor Emeritus of History at the University of York; he published extensively on later medieval history.
AcknowledgementsNote on EditionsList of AbbreviationsIntroduction Winner and Waster: A Poem on the TimesChivalry and Internationalism: The Garter Feast of 1358 and English Diplomacy during the 1350s and 1360sTreason, Public Order and Dispute Settlement: the Statute of Treasons of 1352 and Royal ArbitrationLanded Society, Conspicuous Consumption and the Political Economy: The Sumptuary Laws of 1363The Private and the Public Spheres: The Royal Household and State Finance under Edward IIISatire, Complaint and Authorship: Winner and Waster and the Alliterative Revival of the Fourteenth CenturyWinner and Waster: Timeliness and TimelessnessAppendix 1: Timeline, 1337-1370Appendix 2: A Modern English Version of Winner and WasterBibliographyIndex
In his closing lines, Ormrod modestly hopes that his book's "one contribution" is "to show that historicism need not be a reductive device but can substantively enhance the meaning and value of a text both as history and as literature" . On this count, it more than succeeds.