The Department of Defense (DoD) recently adopted evolutionary acquisition, a dynamic strategy for the development and acquisition of its defense systems. Evolutionary defense systems are planned, in advance, to be developed through several stages in a single procurement program. Each stage is planned to produce a viable system which could be fielded. The system requirements for each stage of development may be specified in advance of a given stage or may be decided at the outset of that stage's development. Due to the different stages that comprise an evolutionary system, there exists a need for careful reexamination of current testing and evaluation policies and processes, which were designed for single-stage developments. The Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (USD-AT&L) and the Director of Operational Testing and Evaluation (DOT&E) asked the Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT) of the National Academies to examine the key issues and implications for defense testing from the introduction of evolutionary acquisition.The CNSTAT was charged with planning and conducting a workshop to study test strategies for the evolutionary acquisition. The committee reviewed defense materials defining evolutionary acquisition and interviewed test officials from the three major test service agencies to understand the current approaches used in testing systems procured through evolutionary acquisition. The committee also examined possible alternatives to identify problems in implementation. At the workshop that took place on December 13-14, 2004, the committee tried to answer many questions including: What are the appropriate roles and objectives for testing in an evolutionary environment?, Can a systematic, disciplined process be developed for testing and evaluation in such a fluid and flexible environment?, and Is there adequate technical expertise within the acquisition community to fully exploit data gathered from previous stages to effectively combine information from various sources for test design and analysis?. Testing of Defense Systems in an Evolutionary Acquisition Environment provides the conclusions and recommendations of the CNSTAT following the workshop and its other investigations.
Oversight Committee for the Workshop on Testing for Dynamic Acquisition of Defense Systems, National Research Council
1 Front Matter; 2 Executive Summary; 3 1 Introduction; 4 2 Testing and Evaluation in an Evolutionary Acquisition Environment; 5 3 Combining Information in Staged Development; 6 4 Changes to Infrastructure, Process, and Culture in Support of Evolutionary Acquisition; 7 References; 8 Appendix A: Overview of the Current Milestone Development Process; 9 Appendix B: Combining Information for Test Design with Staged Development; 10 Appendix C: Software Development in Evolutionary Acquisition; 11 Appendix D: Workshop Agenda and Attendees; 12 Appendix E: Biographical Sketches of Oversight Committee and Staff
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences, Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional Applications
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Dog and Cat Nutrition
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Materials Advisory Board, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Superhard Materials
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Alternative Chemical Demilitarization Technologies
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Environment and Resources Commission on Geosciences, Panel on Effects of Past Global Change on Life
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, Benjamin F. King, Michael L. Cohen, Daniel L. Cork
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Oversight Committee for the Workshop on Survey Automation, William Kalsbeek, Robert Groves, Michael L. Cohen, Daniel L. Cork
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, Benjamin F. King, Michael L. Cohen, Daniel L. Cork
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Michael L. Cohen, Constance F. Citro
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on Statistical Methods for Testing and Evaluating Defense Systems, Duane L. Steffey, John E. Rolph, Michael L. Cohen
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on the Design of the 2010 Census Program of Evaluations and Experiments, Constance F. Citro, Daniel L. Cork, Michael L. Cohen, Lawrence D. Brown
National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, Benjamin F. King, Michael L. Cohen
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Oversight Committee for the Workshop on Statistical Methods in Software Engineering for Defense Systems, Michael L. Cohen, Jesse H. Poore, Siddhartha R. Dalal