The confluence of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack and the U.S. Armya (TM)s historic role to support civil authorities has resulted in substantial new challenges for the Army. To help meet these challenges, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Research and Technology requested the National Research Council (NRC) carry out a series of studies on how science and technology could assist the Army prepare for its role in homeland security (HLS). The NRCa (TM)s Board on Army Science and Technology formed the Committee on Army Science and Technology for Homeland Security to accomplish that assignment. The Committee was asked to review relevant literature and activities, determine areas of emphasis for Army S&T in support of counter terrorism and anti-terrorism, and recommend high-payoff technologies to help the Army fulfill its mission. The Department of Defense Counter-Terrorism Technology Task Force identified four operational areas in reviewing technical proposals for HLS operations: indications and warning; denial and survivability; recovery and consequence management; and attribution and retaliation.The study sponsor asked the Committee to use these four areas as the basis for its assessment of the science and technology (S&T) that will be important for the Armya (TM)s HLS role. Overall, the Committee found that: - There is potential for substantial synergy between S&T work carried out by the Army for its HLS responsibilities and the development of the next generation Army, the Objective Force. - The Army National Guard (ARNG) is critical to the success of the Armya (TM)s HLS efforts.
Committee on Army Science and Technology for Homeland Defense, National Research Council
1 Front Matter; 2 Executive Summary; 3 1. U.S. Army Role in Homeland Security; 4 2. Indications and Warning Technologies; 5 3. Denial and Survivability Technologies; 6 4. Recovery and Consequence Management Technologies; 7 5. Attribution and Retaliation Technologies; 8 6. Committee Observations; 9 7. Complete List of Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations; 10 Appendix A: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members; 11 Appendix B: Committee Meetings; 12 Appendix C: Criteria for Technology Readiness Levels; 13 Appendix D: Federal Response Plan Responsibilities
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences, Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional Applications
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Dog and Cat Nutrition
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Environment and Resources Commission on Geosciences, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Committee to Review the Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Studies Program, Ecology Panel
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Alternative Chemical Demilitarization Technologies
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Environment and Resources Commission on Geosciences, Panel on Effects of Past Global Change on Life
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Army Science and Technology, Committee on Review and Evaluation of Alternative Technologies for Demilitarization of Assembled Chemical Weapons: Phase II
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Board on Army Science and Technology, Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Non-Stockpile Chemical Materiel Disposal Program
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Army Science and Technology, Committee on Review of Army Planning for the Disposal of M55 Rockets at the Anniston Chemical Agent Disposal Facility
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Army Science and Technology, Committee on Directed Energy Technology for Countering Indirect Weapons
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Army Science and Technology, National Materials Advisory Board, Committee on Opportunities in Protection Materials Science and Technology for Future Army Applications
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Army Science and Technology, and Air Conditioning Systems at Chemical Agent Disposal Facilities Committee to Examine the Disposal of Activated Carbon from the Heating, Ventilation
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Army Science and Technology, and Brine Reduction Systems for the Pueblo Chemical Agent Destruction Pilot Plant Committee on Review of Biotreatment, Water Recovery
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Army Science and Technology, Committee on Review and Evaluation of the Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Army Science and Technology, Committee on Evaluation of Chemical Events at Army Chemical Agent Disposal Facilities
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Army Science and Technology, Committee on Effects of the Deletion of Chemical Agent Washout on Operations at the Blue Grass Chemical Agent Destruction Pilot Plant