Commercialization of successful SBIR awards is a key challenge for the program and represents an essential step in the programa (TM)s contribution to government missions. To better understand the challenges inherent in the conversion of promising research to useful products and processes, the National Research Council convened a conference focused on the commercialization of SBIR-funded innovations at DoD and NASA. A unique feature of the conference is that it brought together, for the first time, the program managers, small business leaders, and prime contractor personnel involved in commercializing the results of SBIR awards through procurement at DoD and NASA. These participants identified the challenges and highlighted existing and evolving best practices among successful cases in the third (or commercialization) phase of the SBIR program. The conference, captured in this report, contributed significantly to a better understanding of the obstacles and opportunities in this phase of the SBIR program and to legislation designed to address these challenges.
Committee on Capitalizing on Science, Technology, and Innovation: An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program, Charles W. Wessner, Editor, National Research Council
1 Front Matter; 2 I. Introduction; 3 II. Proceedings, Opening Remarks; 4 Introduction; 5 Meeting Mission Needs; 6 Panel I: The SBIR Program: Different Needs, Common Challenges; 7 Panel II: Transitioning SBIR: What Are the Issues for Prime Contractors?; 8 Panel III: Challenges of Phase III: SBIR Award Winners; 9 Panel IV: Best Practice for Agency Programs: Program Executive Offices and Program Offices; 10 Panel V: Lessons Learned; 11 Concluding Remarks; 12 Appendix A. Biographies of Speakers; 13 Appendix B. Participants List; 14 Appendix C. Bibliography
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences, Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional Applications
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Dog and Cat Nutrition
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Division of Natural Hazard Mitigation, Committee on Natural Disasters
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Division of Natural Hazard Mitigation, Committee on Natural Disasters
National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, and Innovation: An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program Committee on Capitalizing on Science, Technology, Charles W. Wessner
National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, and Innovation: An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program Committee for Capitalizing on Science, Technology, Charles W. Wessner
National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, and Economic Policy Board on Science, Technology, Committee on Competing in the 21st Century: Best Practice in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives, Charles W. Wessner
National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, and Economic Policy Board on Science, Technology, Committee on Comparative National Innovation Policies: Best Practice for the 21st Century, Alan Wm. Wolff, Charles W. Wessner
National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, and Economic Policy Board on Science, Technology, Committee on Competing in the 21st Century: Best Practice in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives, Charles W. Wessner
National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, and Economic Policy Board on Science, Technology, Committee on Competing in the 21st Century: Best Practice in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives, Charles W. Wessner
National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, and Economic Policy Board on Science, Technology, Committee on Comparative Innovation Policy: Best Practice for the 21st Century, Charles W. Wessner
National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, and Economic Policy Board on Science, Technology, Committee on Comparative Innovation Policy: Best Practice for the 21st Century, Charles W. Wessner