The Social Security Administration (SSA) has been engaged in a major effort to redesign the process for determining disability for cash benefits and medical assistance under its Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), Title II of the Social Security Act and the Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Because of the complexity and far-reaching impact of its efforts, SSA concluded that the redesign effort requires extensive research, testing, and validation, as well as further development of some of its components before national implementation. The effect of the new determination process on the number and characteristics of future beneficiaries also needs further study. The agency asked the National Academies to provide ongoing independent and unbiased review of, and recommendations on, its current and proposed research as it relates to the development of a revised disability decision process including the approach, survey design, and content of the complex multiyear Disability Evaluation Study (DES).The present report is the third in a series of short interim reports of the National Academies' Committee to Review the SSA's Disability Decision Process. This third interim report relates directly to one of the contract tasks-review of the design, approach, and content of the DES, as proposed by SSA's contractor for the survey, Westat, Inc. This report is limited to a brief review of the sample design (including that of the pilot study), instruments and procedures, and response rates goals developed by Westat and provided by SSA in June 1999 to the committee for its review and recommendations. It also comments on the proposed timeline for initiation of each phase of the survey.
Gooloo S. Wunderlich and William D. Kalsbeek, Editors; Committee to Review the Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process Research, Institute of Medicine, and Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council
1 Front Matter; 2 1 Introduction; 3 2 Overview of the Disability Evaluation Study; 4 3 Committee Reactions; 5 4 Concluding Comments; 6 References; 7 Appendix: Review of the Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process Research: Study Mandate; 8 Acronyms and Abbreviations; 9 Biographical Sketches of Committee Members
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences, Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional Applications
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Dog and Cat Nutrition
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Materials Advisory Board, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Superhard Materials
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Alternative Chemical Demilitarization Technologies
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Environment and Resources Commission on Geosciences, Panel on Effects of Past Global Change on Life
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on Measuring Rape and Sexual Assault in Bureau of Justice Statistics Household Surveys, Carol C. House, William D. Kalsbeek, Candace Kruttschnitt
National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Institute of Medicine, Division of Health Care Services, Committee to Review the Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process Research, Gooloo S. Wunderlich, Nancy Mathiowetz
National Research Council, Institute of Medicine and Committee on National Statistics, Division of Health Care Services, William D. Kalsbeek, Gooloo S. Wunderlich, William D Kalsbeek, Gooloo S Wunderlich
National Research Council, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Committee on the Review of the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health/Bureau of Labor Statistics Respirator Use Survey, Ericka McGowan, Thomas J. Plewes, William D. Kalsbeek
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Population, Committee on National Statistics, Gooloo S. Wunderlich
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel to Review the U.S Department of Agriculture's Measurement of Food Insecurity and Hunger, Janet L. Norwood, Gooloo S. Wunderlich
National Research Council, Committee on National Statistics, Institute of Medicine, Committee to Review the Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process Research, Gooloo S. Wunderlich
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Gooloo S. Wunderlich
National Research Council, Institute of Medicine, Board on Health Care Services, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on Measuring Medical Care Risk in Conjunction with the New Supplemental Income Poverty Measure, Gooloo S. Wunderlich, Michael J. O'Grady