These essays on violence, intractability, and communication are uniformly of high quality, finely written, and sharply focused. Moreover, this collection adds up to more than the sum of its parts. These essays intersect with one another in complex, suggestive, and illuminating ways. . . . It would of course be impossible to do justice in a review such as this to even one of these clusters of essays, let alone to all four. In a world in which radical conflicts of an increasingly violent character is one of its most salient features, the critical and imaginative attention of such a diverse group of scholars and activists is especially welcome. This volume deserves to be read widely and carefully. It would be hard to identify a more pressing concern than that of how to sustain mediations between (or among) parties whose self-determination so quickly and compulsively drives in the direction of exterminating, violating, ridiculing, denigrating, and in dehumanizing the rivals of these parties. It is impossible for me to think of a volume that more directly, forcefully, and insightfully addresses this concern in both its basic structures and some of its most telling contemporary instantiations. . . . Imagine a volume in which scholars ranging from emeriti to graduate students, hailing from Africa (with a strong representation of scholars from Morocco), Canada, Scotland, Russia, and the United States, with interests ranging from local, regional, national, and global conflicts in their cultural and historical specificity to theories, critiques, discourses, and historiography of radical conflicts and the communicative practices designed to address these intractable struggles. There is, however, no need to imagine such a volume. Andrew R. Smith has relieved us of this by assembling a chorus of voices, at once singular in their mode of expression and conjoined in their morally animated engagement with what is one of the most pressing contemporary issues (How can we effectively address at various levels, from the most immediate and intimate to the global, intractable conflicts, especially address such conflicts in such a way as to break or, at least, attenuate the link between such conflicts and violence?). It is not an exaggeration to claim that all other major contemporary issues are bound up with this one.