"Who was Anton Wilhelm Amo?" - "Remapping the Jungle" vs. "Vom faulen Holze lebend"?!

Document from the year 2009 in the subject Philosophy - Practical (Ethics, Aesthetics, Culture, Nature, Right, ...), University of Vienna (Institut fr Rechtsphilosophie, Religions- und Kulturrecht), course: Wider das Vergessen! - Kritische Beitrge junger RechtswissenschafterInnen?, language: English, abstract: Karl LARENZ (jun) - a "famous prime father" of German legal science (, as e.g. judge Prof Dr Thomas HOEREN put it in the - basically - highy-quality newspaper "FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG"? Immanuel KANT - a "world master" of thinking (, as e.g. GRABNER-HAIDER/WEINKE put it)? - E.g. WIMMER, FIRLA, HENTGES et al cast doubt on the "mode" of presenting e.g. students (almost) "semi-divine" (?) legal thinkers, often not even mentioning any of their pseudo-scientific research. Should holocaust-implications not at least cause a "stir" (of critical re-thinking) the mode of presenting "viri "boni""?