Peter Burdon is Associate Professor and Reader at the Adelaide Law School, The University of Adelaide, Australia.

• 1 Introduction: The Eichmann fires2 The House of Judgment3 The gray zone: Kapo trials4 The accused5 From expulsion to extermination6 Wannsee: The enabling conference7 Duties of a law-abiding citizen8 The deportation chapters9 Did Eichmann receive a fair trial?10 Judgment11 Reading Eichmann today12 The last Nazi trials and forgiveness

Peter Burdon’s Hannah Arendt: Legal Theory and the Eichmann Trial fills a lacuna in legal theory, coming to terms, as it does, with the legal implications of Arendt’s writings and, in particular, of her analysis of the trial of Adolph Eichmann. The beauty, and critical importance, of this book lies in the way that Burdon mixes a close reading of Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem, within a larger context, both of her own engagement as a political theorist but also in terms of national and international law. Through Burdon’s careful reading, we reencounter Arendt’s judgments about the law and the trial of Eichamann through a screen of larger legal and ethical issues. Reading Arendt in this context clarifies and engages with many of her views (some very controversial) and helps us to understand both why she made these judgments and also what ramifications they have for questions of law and politics.Professor James Martel, San Francisco State University.Hannah Arendt: Legal Theory and the Eichmann Trial makes a unique contribution to the study of Arendt and law, in way that is as stimulating for its methodological approach as it is for its contribution substantive debate. Students and academics, Arendt and legal scholars alike will find here more than a valuable introduction to one of Arendt’s most (in)famous works. By extrapolating from that work to the many and varied ways in which Arendt engaged with law across her oeuvre this book offers fresh insights both into what Arendt herself had to say about law and what Arendt’s work says to contemporary debates in legal theory and practice. Christopher McCorkindale, University of StrathclydeMarco Goldoni, University of Glasgow

Peter Burdon is Associate Professor and Reader at the Adelaide Law School, The University of Adelaide, Australia.

• 1 Introduction: The Eichmann fires2 The House of Judgment3 The gray zone: Kapo trials4 The accused5 From expulsion to extermination6 Wannsee: The enabling conference7 Duties of a law-abiding citizen8 The deportation chapters9 Did Eichmann receive a fair trial?10 Judgment11 Reading Eichmann today12 The last Nazi trials and forgiveness

Peter Burdon’s Hannah Arendt: Legal Theory and the Eichmann Trial fills a lacuna in legal theory, coming to terms, as it does, with the legal implications of Arendt’s writings and, in particular, of her analysis of the trial of Adolph Eichmann. The beauty, and critical importance, of this book lies in the way that Burdon mixes a close reading of Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem, within a larger context, both of her own engagement as a political theorist but also in terms of national and international law. Through Burdon’s careful reading, we reencounter Arendt’s judgments about the law and the trial of Eichamann through a screen of larger legal and ethical issues. Reading Arendt in this context clarifies and engages with many of her views (some very controversial) and helps us to understand both why she made these judgments and also what ramifications they have for questions of law and politics.Professor James Martel, San Francisco State University.Hannah Arendt: Legal Theory and the Eichmann Trial makes a unique contribution to the study of Arendt and law, in way that is as stimulating for its methodological approach as it is for its contribution substantive debate. Students and academics, Arendt and legal scholars alike will find here more than a valuable introduction to one of Arendt’s most (in)famous works. By extrapolating from that work to the many and varied ways in which Arendt engaged with law across her oeuvre this book offers fresh insights both into what Arendt herself had to say about law and what Arendt’s work says to contemporary debates in legal theory and practice. Christopher McCorkindale, University of StrathclydeMarco Goldoni, University of Glasgow

Peter Burdon is Associate Professor and Reader at the Adelaide Law School, The University of Adelaide, Australia.

• 1 Introduction: The Eichmann fires2 The House of Judgment3 The gray zone: Kapo trials4 The accused5 From expulsion to extermination6 Wannsee: The enabling conference7 Duties of a law-abiding citizen8 The deportation chapters9 Did Eichmann receive a fair trial?10 Judgment11 Reading Eichmann today12 The last Nazi trials and forgiveness

Peter Burdon’s Hannah Arendt: Legal Theory and the Eichmann Trial fills a lacuna in legal theory, coming to terms, as it does, with the legal implications of Arendt’s writings and, in particular, of her analysis of the trial of Adolph Eichmann. The beauty, and critical importance, of this book lies in the way that Burdon mixes a close reading of Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem, within a larger context, both of her own engagement as a political theorist but also in terms of national and international law. Through Burdon’s careful reading, we reencounter Arendt’s judgments about the law and the trial of Eichamann through a screen of larger legal and ethical issues. Reading Arendt in this context clarifies and engages with many of her views (some very controversial) and helps us to understand both why she made these judgments and also what ramifications they have for questions of law and politics.Professor James Martel, San Francisco State University.Hannah Arendt: Legal Theory and the Eichmann Trial makes a unique contribution to the study of Arendt and law, in way that is as stimulating for its methodological approach as it is for its contribution substantive debate. Students and academics, Arendt and legal scholars alike will find here more than a valuable introduction to one of Arendt’s most (in)famous works. By extrapolating from that work to the many and varied ways in which Arendt engaged with law across her oeuvre this book offers fresh insights both into what Arendt herself had to say about law and what Arendt’s work says to contemporary debates in legal theory and practice. Christopher McCorkindale, University of StrathclydeMarco Goldoni, University of Glasgow