Del 46 i serien Law and Philosophy Library

Essays in Legal Theory

Inbunden, Engelska, 2000

AvRobert Summers

2 539 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.

Finns i fler format (1)

Häftad

2 759 kr

Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar

The essays in this book treat important aspects of most of the major themes in contemporary philosophy of law and legal theory. Many of the essays are relatively original. All reveal the distinctive authenticity of the author's work, for he is not only a reputable legal theorist but an internationally known scholar of private law, and for many years chair of the Bielefelder Kreis, an international group of legal theorists who have jointly authored major works comparing methodologies of statutory interpretation and precedent.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum2000-06-30
Mått156 x 234 x 30 mm
Vikt863 g
FormatInbunden
SpråkEngelska
SerieLaw and Philosophy Library
Antal sidor445
Upplaga2000
FörlagKluwer Academic Publishers
ISBN9780792363675

Tillhör följande kategorier

Juridik: metod och teori inom Juridik

General Theory of Law.- H.L.A. Hart’s the Concept of Law.- Rudolf von Jhering’s Influence on American Legal Theory.- Law as a Type of “Machine” Technology.- On Identifying and Reconstructing a General Legal Theory.- My Philosophy of Law.- Form in Law.- The Formal Character of Law.- A Formal Theory of the Rule of Law.- The Formal Character of Law — Statutory Rules.- Legal Reasoning.- Interpreting Statutes and Precedents — Two Comparative Studies.- The Argument from Ordinary Meaning in Statutory Interpretation.- Interpreting Statutes — Should Courts Consider Materials of Legislative History?.- Formal Legal Truth and Substantive Truth in Judicial Fact-Finding.- Contract Theory.- The Conceptualization of Good Faith in American Contract Law.- Substantive Justification in Contract Cases — the Primacy of Rightness Reasons.- Critique of Economic Analysis of Law.- Economics and the Autonomy of Law, Legal Analysis and Legal Theory.- Economists’ Reasons for Common Law Decisions.