This book analyses the role of actors that critically aid adjudicators at different stages of the dispute resolution process across 20 international dispute resolution bodies. Collectively referred to as 'dispute assistants' in the book, these actors are known by different names such as legal officers, référendaires, secretariat staff, registry staff, etc. The book uses doctrinal research, supplemented through interviews with relevant actors in each dispute resolution body, and delivers a holistic view of their everyday practice. The book provides a comparative study on the functions of dispute assistants at every stage of the dispute resolution process, revealing the widespread and critical nature of their work. It addresses the legitimacy concerns raised about the alleged influence dispute assistants may exercise over adjudicators as well as in the decision-making process. These concerns are traced across sources such as judicial/quasi-judicial decisions; statements or criticisms raised by States parties, academics, or practitioners; and concerns that arose in conversations with judges, dispute assistants, and other relevant actors. By employing a comparative lens, the book moves from concerns that are specific to individual dispute resolution bodies towards general concerns.By tapping into the wealth of comparative practices across dispute resolution bodies to navigate these legitimacy concerns, this essential book reframes the narrative that dispute assistants threaten the legitimacy of international dispute resolution, and proposes solutions to show how their expertise can be leveraged to strengthen the legitimacy of outcomes.
Gabrielle Marceau is Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law, University of Geneva, Switzerland.Maria George is a PhD candidate in the International Law Department of the Geneva Graduate Institute, Switzerland.
1. IntroductionPart I: Overview of the Institutions: Structure, Procedure, and Observations on the Role of Dispute Assistants2. African Court of Human and Peoples’ Rights3. Court of Justice of the European Union4. Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa Court of Justice5. Commercial Arbitration6. The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement7. East African Court of Justice8. Economic Community of West African States Court of Justice9. European Court of Human Rights10. Court of Justice of the European Free Trade Association11. Inter-American Court of Human Rights12. International Court of Justice13. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes14. International Criminal Tribunals15. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea16. Iran-US Claims Tribunal17. Mercado Común Del Sur18. Permanent Court of Arbitration19. World Trade Organisation Dispute Settlement SystemPart II: Comparative Study on Dispute Assistants20. Situating Dispute Assistants: A Comparative Perspective21. Concerns on the Influence of Dispute Assistants and Useful Practices/ProceduresPart III: Dispute Assistants and the WTO DSS22. Dispute Assistants and the Selection Process of ad hoc Adjudicators23. Dispute Assistants and the WTO Adjudicative Process24. How to Implement Possible Reform into the WTO DSS?25. Conclusion
Gabrielle Marceau, Geneva; President of the Executive of the International Economic Law Society) Marceau, Gabrielle (Legal Affairs Officer with GATT, Geneva; President of the Executive of the International Economic Law Society, Legal Affairs Officer with GATT, Gabrielle Z. Marceau
Georges Abi-Saab, Kenneth Keith, Gabrielle Marceau, Clément Marquet, Geneva) Abi-Saab, Georges (Graduate Institute, Sir Kenneth (Victoria University of Wellington) Keith, Switzerland) Marceau, Gabrielle (University of Geneva, Clement (University of Geneva) Marquet
Georges Abi-Saab, Kenneth Keith, Gabrielle Marceau, Clément Marquet, Geneva) Abi-Saab, Georges (Graduate Institute, Sir Kenneth (Victoria University of Wellington) Keith, Switzerland) Marceau, Gabrielle (University of Geneva, Clement (University of Geneva) Marquet