The book argues that there is in the US, Canada and UK, a general right to conscientious exemption available to a person who objects to any legal obligation whatsoever on the basis of a religious or non-religious conscientious belief. The book provides a liberal defence of this right and argues that it should be considered a defining feature of a liberal democracy. A general right to conscientious exemption is a legal right to conscientiously object to any obligation imposed by law and to receive from a court an exemption from complying with such obligation. The general right defended in the book is not an absolute right. A court may refuse to grant an exemption if doing so would disproportionately impact the rights of others or the public interest. The book suggests how the general right should be balanced against important rights, such as non-discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
John Adenitire is a Strategic Lecturer in the School of Law at Queen Mary, University of London. He completed his PhD at Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge. He has researched at Cambridge, Durham, Birmingham, the UCL Constitution Unit, the Bingham Centre and the UK Commission on a Bill of Rights.
1. Introduction; 2. The General Right to Conscientious Exemption in US Law; 3. The General Right to Conscientious Exemption in US Law: Beyond Religious Privilege? 4. The General Right to Conscientious Exemption in Canadian Law; 5. The General Right to Conscientious Exemption in Canadian Law: Beyond Religious Privilege?; 6. The General Right to Conscientious Exemption in UK Law; 7. The General Right to Conscientious Exemption in UK Law: Beyond Religious Privilege? 8. The Liberal Model of Conscientious Exemptions; 9. Balancing the General Right with Sexual Orientation Discrimination; 10. Conclusion.
'At a time when the highest courts in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States are all wrestling with the difficult contours of conscience rights, this book provides an invaluable panoramic view of the doctrinal landscape in each jurisdiction, along with a bold and incisive normative claim about the importance of extending exemption rights beyond religion in the modern liberal state.' Jim Oleske, Professor, Lewis and Clark Law School, Oregon