International Political Theory after Hobbes

CAMILLA BOISEN Research Associate at the National History Museum, Frederiksborg Castle, Denmark DAVID BOUCHER Professor in the School of European Studies at Cardiff University, Wales, UK GLEN NEWEY Professor in the School of Politics, International Relations and Philosophy at Keele University, UK RAIA PROKHOVNIK Reader in Politics at the Open University, UK SERGEI PROZOROV Collegium Research Fellow at the Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, University of Helsinki, Finland GABRIELLA SLOMP Senior Lecturer at the University of St Andrews, UK TOM SORELL John Ferguson Professor of Global Ethics and Director of the Centre for the Study of Global Ethics at the University of Birmingham, UK ROB WALKER Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Victoria, Canada HOWARD WILLIAMS Professor in the Department of International Politics at the University of Abersytwyth, Wales, UK MICHAEL WILLIAMS Professor in the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at theUniversity of Ottawa, Canada

• Introduction; R.Prokhovnik & G.Slomp ANALYSIS The Politics of Motion and the Motion of Politics; G.Slomp Hobbes, Public Safety and Political Economy; T.Sorrell Leviathan and Liberal Moralism in International Theory; G.Newey INTERPRETATION Hobbes and the Subjection of International Relations to Law and Morality; C.Boisen & D.Boucher Kantian Perspectives on Intervention: Transcending Rather than Rejecting Hobbes; H.Williams The State of Nature as a Site of Happy Life: On Giorgio Agamben's Reading of Hobbes; S.Prozorov ORIENTATION Recasting the Hobbesian Legacy in International Political Theory; M.C.Williams Hobbes, Origins, Limits; R.Walker Hobbes, Sovereignty, and Politics: Rethinking International Political Space; R.Prokhovnik

'The book focuses well on underappreciated aspects of Hobbesian debates in contemporary international relations literature and gracefully incorporates current events to illuminate the pointed (though sometimes arcane) aspects of Hobbes' thought emphasised throughout.' -Political Studies Review